{"id":310,"date":"2018-02-12T17:37:40","date_gmt":"2018-02-12T17:37:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/alexyakovlev\/?p=310"},"modified":"2018-02-12T17:54:18","modified_gmt":"2018-02-12T17:54:18","slug":"real-natures-proportionality-is-geometric-newtons-causality","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/alexyakovlev\/2018\/02\/12\/real-natures-proportionality-is-geometric-newtons-causality\/","title":{"rendered":"Real Nature&#8217;s proportionality is geometric: Newton&#8217;s causality"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>I recently enjoyed e-mail exchanges with Ed Dellian.<\/p>\n<p>Ed is one of the very few modern philosophers and science historians who read Newton&#8217;s Principia in original (and produced his own translation of Principia to German &#8211; published in 1988).<\/p>\n<p>Ed&#8217;s position is that the real physical (Nature&#8217;s) laws reflect cause and effect in the form of <strong>geometric proportionality<\/strong>. The most fundamental being E\/p=c, where E is energy, p is momentum and c is velocity &#8211; a proportionality coefficient, i.e. a constant associated with space over time.\u00a0 This view is in line with the Poynting vector understanding of electromagnetism, also accepted by Heaviside in his notion of &#8216;energy current&#8217;.\u00a0It even is the basis of Einstein&#8217;s E\/mc = c.<\/p>\n<p>The diversion from geometric proportionality towards <strong>arithmetic proportionality<\/strong> was due to Leibniz and his principle of &#8220;<em>causa aequat effectum<\/em>&#8220;. According to Ed (I am quoting him here)\u00a0 &#8211; &#8220;<em>it is a principle that has nothing to do with reality, since it implies &#8220;instantanity&#8221; of interaction, that is, interaction independently of &#8220;real space&#8221; and &#8220;real time&#8221;, conflicting with the age-old natural experience expressed by Galileo that &#8220;nothing happens but in space and time&#8221;<\/em> &#8220;. It is therefore important to see how Maxwellian electromagnetism is seen by scholars. For example, Faraday&#8217;s law states an <em>equivalence of<\/em> EMF and the rate of change of magnetic flux &#8211; it is not a geometric proportion, hence it is not causal!<\/p>\n<p>My view, which is based on my experience with electronic circuits and my understanding of causality between and energy and information transfer (state-changes), where energy is cause and information transfer is effect, is in agreement with geometric proportionality. Energy causes state-transitions in space-time. This is what I call energy-modulated computing. It is challenging to refine this proportionality in every real problem case!<\/p>\n<p>If you want to know more about Ed Dellian&#8217;s views, I recommend visiting his site\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.neutonus-reformatus.de\">http:\/\/www.neutonus-reformatus.de\u00a0<\/a>\u00a0which contains several interesting papers.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>I recently enjoyed e-mail exchanges with Ed Dellian. Ed is one of the very few modern philosophers and science historians who read Newton&#8217;s Principia in original (and produced his own translation of Principia to German &#8211; published in 1988). Ed&#8217;s &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/alexyakovlev\/2018\/02\/12\/real-natures-proportionality-is-geometric-newtons-causality\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4763,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[16,12,1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-310","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-causality","category-electromagnetism","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/alexyakovlev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/alexyakovlev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/alexyakovlev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/alexyakovlev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/4763"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/alexyakovlev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=310"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/alexyakovlev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":314,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/alexyakovlev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/310\/revisions\/314"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/alexyakovlev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=310"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/alexyakovlev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=310"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/alexyakovlev\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=310"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}