![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/cesi\/files\/2017\/08\/phil.png\")
<\/h4>\nBEng EngD CEng SMIEEE FIET FHEA<\/em> http:\/\/www.cesienergy.org.uk \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 <\/p>\n Do we need to continue to open new coal mines to meet our energy needs? Can a whole systems perspective help the UK to meet its obligations to reduce carbon emissions and also ensure a secure energy supply?<\/p>\n In November 2015 the UK Government laid out plans for all coal-fired power stations to be phased out by 2025 at the latest.\u00a0 As coal is the most polluting of the UK\u2019s energy sources, including gas, and in light of the Paris Agreement under which the UK and other countries have agreed to undertake rapid reductions carbon emissions, coal is simply uneconomic as a fuel. In order to eliminate carbon emissions, energy companies urgently need to replace coal with cleaner energy sources.<\/p>\n Given this need to replace coal as a fuel, it is worrying that a new large opencast mine has been proposed near Druridge Bay in Northumberland.\u00a0 The justification for opening the mine is that the coal extracted would be used to fuel power stations \u2013 maintaining the UK\u2019s further reliance on coal as a fuel source.<\/p>\n Planning permission for the mine was approved by Northumberland County Council in July 2016.\u00a0\u00a0 However, Central Government called the approval for the mine to public inquiry on grounds of climate change.\u00a0\u00a0 This is the first time any planning permission decision has been called to public enquiry, on these grounds.<\/p>\n During the public inquiry which began May 2017, HJ Banks & Co Ltd, the proposed developer of the site, argued that coal fired power stations are essential for the security of the UK\u2019s energy supply.\u00a0 Their expert witness argued that if coal fired power stations are phased out, a significant number of new gas fired power stations would be required, providing 7GW of gas generation. Other cleaner sources of energy cannot be relied upon as a consistent source of energy.\u00a0 Wind power, for example, provides an intermittent source of energy as the wind does not always blow, and so wind turbines cannot be relied upon to satisfy the UK\u2019s energy needs.\u00a0 Similarly the sun does not always shine, so photovoltaic systems will not generate sufficient energy.\u00a0 For these reasons, opening the new mine would be an important step in ensuring that the UK maintains good supply of coal for its power stations.<\/p>\n This siloed approach does not take into account the reality of the energy mix. There is no single source of fuel that provides the energy to satisfy the whole of the UK\u2019s energy requirements.\u00a0 The Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS) collate data on the UK\u2019s electricity generation mix which are updated each quarter. These most recent figures were released in June 2017.\u00a0 These show that compared with a year ago, gas generated energy increased by 3% to 40%, nuclear energy increased by 0.1% (19%) and renewables (wind and solar, hydro and bioenergy) increased 1% to 27%.\u00a0 During the same period, the proportion of energy generated from coal fell by 5% to 11%.\u00a0 These figures show coal is declining in importance and that we have many options to replace it.\u00a0 However, it is just as important to consider flexibility in the energy system as a means of phasing out coal.\u00a0 This flexibility can help us deal with peaks in demand and variability in the output of renewable energy sources.\u00a0 This flexibility can be provided by a mixture of energy storage, demand side response (DSR) and interconnectors [i]<\/a>.<\/p>\n It is essential to take a whole systems approach when considering the UK\u2019s energy mix. In order for the UK to meet the climate change commitments of the Paris Agreement, it needs to continue to phase out its coal fired power stations.\u00a0 This would be possible by increasing the utilisation of existing gas facilities plus a small increase in capacity in power from gas; and combining this with power produced from renewables such as wind, biomass and PV.<\/p>\n We can use a variety of technologies at a variety of scales to store energy when we have more than is needed, or when there is too much for network cables to carry. This energy can then be used at a time when it\u2019s needed.<\/p>\n Britain also imports energy, via physical links known as interconnectors.\u00a0 At present, the British energy market has 4GW of interconnector capacity.\u00a0 The UK energy regulator, Ofgem, forecasts that planned projects will mean that this capacity will increase to 7.3GW by 2021.\u00a0 In addition, the electricity required could be managed through Demand Side Response (DSR), where consumers are given incentives to reduce their energy demand by reducing usage or turning off non-essential items when there is a peak in electricity demand [ii]<\/a>.<\/p>\n The increase in interconnector capacity, energy storage and DSR will help to balance supply and demand on the electricity grid, reducing the need to build new power stations.\u00a0 An additional benefit of decarbonising our energy system more rapidly is that this offers the opportunity to also decarbonise our transport and heat sectors.<\/p>\n Professor Phil Taylor presented this argument at the Public Inquiry into the proposed open cast mine at Highthorn, Northumberland.\u00a0 His argument represents one of the many decisions we could make to keep the lights on and is an example of the ways we can apply whole systems thinking to energy.\u00a0\u00a0 Professor Taylor appeared as an expert witness to the Inquiry for Friends of the Earth on a pro bono basis.\u00a0 The outcome of the public inquiry is expected in autumn 2017.<\/p>\n <\/a>[i] Department for Business, Energy & Industrial Strategy (2017).\u00a0Section 5, Electricity. Energy Trends:\u00a0June 2017\u00a0<\/em>[Online]. Available at: https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/statistics\/energy-trends-june-2017<\/a><\/a>\u00a0[Accessed 17\/7\/2017].<\/p>\n <\/a>[ii]\u00a0\u00a0 Ofgem (2017). Electricity Interconnectors. <\/em>[Online]. Available at:\u00a0<\/em>https:\/\/www.ofgem.gov.uk\/electricity\/transmission-networks\/electricity-interconnectors<\/a> [Accessed 21\/7\/2017].<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Do we need to continue to open new coal mines to meet our energy needs? Can a whole systems perspective help the UK to meet its obligations to reduce carbon emissions and also ensure a secure energy supply? Professor Phil Taylor discusses his input to the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) planning debate … Continue reading Can the UK kick its coal habit? – Professor Phil Taylor<\/span>
\nDirector, EPSRC National Centre for Energy Systems Integration
\nSiemens Professor of Energy Systems
\nDeputy Pro Vice Chancellor of SAgE Faculty
\nHead of the School of Engineering
\nNewcastle University \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0 \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n![\"\"](\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/cesi\/files\/2017\/08\/logos-300x66.jpg\")
<\/p>\n
\nHJ Banks & Co Ltd argument for coal too narrow<\/h5>\n
UK needs whole energy system approach<\/h5>\n
\nReferences<\/h6>\n