Natural wildlife movement corridors are being restored in fragmented landscapes to reconnect animal populations and restore wildlife habitats. This can benefit people, enhancing soil and water quality, and biodiversity. Another critical goal of corridor restoration is to reduce human-wildlife conflict by managing wildlife movement through village land. <\/p>\n\n\n\n
However, what is the evidence base used in decision-making for the restoration process? is it effective? exhaustive? <\/p>\n\n\n\n
We have established this SNAPP Team<\/a> to co-create interdisciplinary evidence that can inform tree restoration in agricultural landscapes in a way that balances the needs of people with the ecological targets of the restoration. Specifically, we aim to <\/p>\n\n\n\n The group will develop guidance on processes and tools that should be used when planning and implementing sustainable tree restoration projects in the rural tropics.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" Natural wildlife movement corridors are being restored in fragmented landscapes to reconnect animal populations and restore wildlife habitats. This can benefit people, enhancing soil and water quality, and biodiversity. Another critical goal of corridor restoration is to reduce human-wildlife conflict … Continue reading