{"id":3741,"date":"2015-11-27T14:40:29","date_gmt":"2015-11-27T14:40:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/?p=3741"},"modified":"2015-11-27T14:42:56","modified_gmt":"2015-11-27T14:42:56","slug":"spending-review-2015-what-does-it-mean-for-science","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/spending-review-2015-what-does-it-mean-for-science\/","title":{"rendered":"Spending Review 2015 &#8211; what does it mean for science?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><em><strong>by Paula Salgado<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<p>After many months of speculation and concern, the details of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/spending-review-and-autumn-statement-2015-documents\/spending-review-and-autumn-statement-2015\" target=\"_blank\">Spending Review 2015<\/a> when it comes to science feels, at first, as a massive relief. After all, the Chancellor announced that science funding would be protected in real terms this time, &#8220;raised to \u00a34.7bn by 2020 and capital spending to remain at 6.9\u00a3bn over this period&#8221;. We should be celebrating, surely! However, a detailed analysis shows that this really means that public investment in science will be frozen for the next 5 years. In fact, according to a <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/publications\/spending-review-and-autumn-statement-2015-documents\/spending-review-and-autumn-statement-2015\" target=\"_blank\">detailed analysis<\/a>\u00a0(source: Scienceogram.org):<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>The Science Budget is and will remain <strong>lower in real terms than it was in 2010<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<li>The Science Budget is falling per person living in the UK, and as a fraction of GDP. By 2020, the Science Budget will be <strong>nearly 20% lower as a fraction of GDP<\/strong> than it was in 2010.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/science-budget-2010-2020-sr2015-1.0.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft wp-image-3743 size-full\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/science-budget-2010-2020-sr2015-1.0.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"600\" height=\"375\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/science-budget-2010-2020-sr2015-1.0.png 600w, https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/science-budget-2010-2020-sr2015-1.0-300x188.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/science-budget-2010-2020-sr2015-1.0-480x300.png 480w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 600px) 100vw, 600px\" \/><\/a>And we also need to <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/department-for-business-innovation-and-skills-settlement-at-the-spending-review-2015\" target=\"_blank\">look at the details<\/a>, not just the main headlines. The science resource budget (those \u00a34.7bn) will now include a newly announced Global Challenges Fund &#8220;to ensure UK science takes the lead in addressing the problems faced by developing countries whilst developing our ability to deliver cutting-edge research.&#8221; Depending on how this fund will be managed and organised, there is a concern that this could mean that some\u00a0of the funds\u00a0which are currently part of the Science Budget will be diverted\u00a0to sustain the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/news\/international-development-official-development-assistance-target-bill-2015-receives-royal-assent\" target=\"_blank\">Governments commitment to spend\u00a00.7% of GDP on international developmen<\/a>t.<\/p>\n<p>It is also still not clear how the implementation of the <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/uploads\/system\/uploads\/attachment_data\/file\/478125\/BIS-15-625-ensuring-a-successful-UK-research-endeavour.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">Nurse Review<\/a> in to how Science is funded in the UK will undoubtedly affect the funding landscape. Setting up an overarching structure will have its costs and we need to see how that will translate into funding allocation.<\/p>\n<p>But most importantly, this flat cash real-terms freeze is yet another failed opportunity to increase investment in research and development that is<a href=\"http:\/\/scienceogram.org\/in-depth\/international-comparisons\/\" target=\"_blank\"> required to maintain the UK&#8217;s leading role<\/a> and sustain <a href=\"http:\/\/sciencecampaign.org.uk\/Whychampionscienceandengineering.pdf\" target=\"_blank\">economic growth<\/a>. Five years of flat\u00a0cash has already had a detrimental effect on R&amp;D, not only in terms of the<a href=\"http:\/\/scienceogram.org\/blog\/2014\/12\/autumn-statement-2014-george-osborne\/\" target=\"_blank\"> decline in available funds<\/a> but also in <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceisvital.org.uk\/2013\/06\/17\/legacy-of-the-2010-science-budget-cash-freeze-final-report\/\" target=\"_blank\">reputation and work of labs<\/a> across the country. With the positive economic signs announced by the Chancellor, the Government had a chance to reverse the current managed decline of R&amp;D in the UK but decided to continue on a similar path. The long term effects of these decisions will only be clear over the next few decades &#8211; but that is why many, including the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/science\/political-science\/2015\/nov\/25\/what-does-the-spending-review-mean-for-science-and-innovation\" target=\"_blank\">Wellcome Trust <\/a>and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.rcuk.ac.uk\/media\/news\/151125\/\" target=\"_blank\">RCUK<\/a>, reacted with caution at the real-term freeze announcement.<\/p>\n<p><strong>The lead up to the Spending Review<\/strong><\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_3750\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/FTsciencecuts.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3750\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-3750\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/FTsciencecuts-300x295.png\" alt=\"Lettter in FT calling on the Chancellor not to cut science funding (Sept 7, 2015)\" width=\"300\" height=\"295\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/FTsciencecuts-300x295.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/FTsciencecuts-305x300.png 305w, https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/FTsciencecuts.png 618w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-3750\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Lettter in FT calling on the Chancellor not to cut science funding (Sept 7, 2015)<\/p><\/div>\n<p>With rumours of <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/science\/political-science\/2015\/oct\/01\/sajid-javids-blueprint-for-bis-heightens-fears-for-research-funding\" target=\"_blank\">20 to 40% cuts being &#8220;leaked&#8221;<\/a> throughout the summer and even a rushed <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/science\/political-science\/2015\/aug\/24\/why-the-secrecy-mr-javid-tell-us-more-about-the-mckinsey-review\" target=\"_blank\">review from a private consulting company<\/a> looking on how to make cost savings across the Department for Business, Innovation &amp;\u00a0Skills (BIS), the scientific community had reasons to be concerned. Many voices spoke publicly against the axe falling on public science funding:\u00a0a <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ft.com\/cms\/s\/0\/83938318-5557-11e5-8642-453585f2cfcd.html#axzz3shPvI6Hi\" target=\"_blank\">letter<\/a> from\u00a0many charities and learned societies, together with several companies was published in the Financial Times, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.buzzfeed.com\/tomchivers\/top-scientists-warn-funding-cuts-will-cost-uk-its-position-a#.eoZKkoanX\" target=\"_blank\">UK top scientists sharing their views on Buzzfeed<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/science\/2015\/nov\/01\/science-is-vital-british-legacy-contact-mp\" target=\"_blank\">several opinion pieces<\/a> in the media from <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/science\/political-science\/2015\/nov\/25\/what-does-the-spending-review-mean-for-science-and-innovation\" target=\"_blank\">leading scientists<\/a> and <a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/science\/2015\/nov\/09\/lack-of-investment-in-research-puts-britains-reputation-at-risk\" target=\"_blank\">journalists<\/a> urged the Government to not impose any cuts and seriously consider increasing current investment in order to support future growth. Behind the scenes, influential learned societies and campaign groups lobbied the Chancellor, the new Minister for Universities and Science, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/people\/jo-johnson\" target=\"_blank\">Jo Johnson<\/a>, and the new Secretary for BIS, <a href=\"https:\/\/www.gov.uk\/government\/people\/sajid-javid\" target=\"_blank\">Sajid Javi<\/a>d to stress the same points. And the House of Commons Science &amp; Technology Committee made detailed recommendations that the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.parliament.uk\/business\/committees\/committees-a-z\/commons-select\/science-and-technology-committee\/news-parliament-2015\/the-science-budget-report-published-15-16\/\" target=\"_blank\">science budget should be increased<\/a>, just a few weeks\u00a0before the Spending Review announcement.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_3751\" style=\"width: 310px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/SiVrally2015.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3751\" class=\"size-medium wp-image-3751\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/SiVrally2015-300x179.jpg\" alt=\"Science is Vital chair, Dr Jenny Rohhn,  and  vice-chair, Prof Stephen Curry, at the rally in London, 26th October 2015\" width=\"300\" height=\"179\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/SiVrally2015-300x179.jpg 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/SiVrally2015-1024x610.jpg 1024w, https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/SiVrally2015-500x298.jpg 500w, https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/SiVrally2015.jpg 1920w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-3751\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Science is Vital chair, Dr Jenny Rohhn, and vice-chair, Prof Stephen Curry, at the rally in London, 26th October 2015<\/p><\/div>\n<p>But it wasn&#8217;t just prominent voices. As in 2010, <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceisvital.org.uk\/\" target=\"_blank\">Science is Vital<\/a> organised a grass roots campaign to get the voice of scientific community and all supporters of science be heard. There was a <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceisvital.org.uk\/science-is-vital-live-in-london-the-video\/\" target=\"_blank\">big science event in London<\/a> with scientists, patient groups, journalists and entertainers all rallying to support sustained public investment in science.\u00a0Across the UK, local events raised the same issues within local communities, getting people to joint watch the event in London but also discuss how science is important to them. And nearly 2000 people <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceisvital.org.uk\/postcards-for-george-2015\/\" target=\"_blank\">wrote a postcard to George Osborne<\/a>, telling him why they thought Science is Vital.<\/p>\n<div id=\"attachment_3749\" style=\"width: 622px\" class=\"wp-caption alignleft\"><a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/JOJohnsonSRtweet.png\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-3749\" class=\"size-full wp-image-3749\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/JOJohnsonSRtweet.png\" alt=\"Science Minister commenting on Science Budget announcement in Spending Review 2015 on Tweeter\" width=\"612\" height=\"173\" srcset=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/JOJohnsonSRtweet.png 612w, https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/JOJohnsonSRtweet-300x85.png 300w, https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/files\/2015\/11\/JOJohnsonSRtweet-500x141.png 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 612px) 100vw, 612px\" \/><\/a><p id=\"caption-attachment-3749\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Science Minister commenting on Science Budget announcement in Spending Review 2015 on Tweeter<\/p><\/div>\n<p>The fact that the Science Minister has now used the phrase &#8220;Science is Vital&#8221; publicly in at least two occasions, including in his reaction to the SR2015 on social media, means that this important message is getting across our politicians and key decision makers.\u00a0As more \u00a0details of the Spending Review are announced in the coming days and weeks, we will surely have opportunities to continue to let them know why Science is Vital.<\/p>\n<p>What do you think? You can leave your comments below.<br \/>\nScience is Vital is also asking for <a href=\"http:\/\/scienceisvital.org.uk\/2015\/11\/27\/spending-review-2015-your-reactions\/\" target=\"_blank\">your reactions<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>by Paula Salgado After many months of speculation and concern, the details of the Spending Review 2015 when it comes to science feels, at first, as a massive relief. After all, the Chancellor announced that science funding would be protected &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/spending-review-2015-what-does-it-mean-for-science\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5015,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[6,4],"tags":[141,30,140],"class_list":["post-3741","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-general","category-news","tag-funding","tag-science-policy","tag-spending-review-2015"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3741","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5015"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3741"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3741\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3754,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3741\/revisions\/3754"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3741"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3741"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/icamblog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3741"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}