Although the unit of assessment has been clearly defined, the individual student does not act in isolation of the surrounding environment. In order to understand and assess the impact of peer learning on the subject, it is necessary to build a abstract representation of the classroom in terms of a dynamic movement of values and meaning. In this context, a researchers perspective operates within the positivist-interpretist paradigm; existence is founded on an objective reality imposed on the individual or existence is a subjective reality defined by individual perception (of which school represents just one of multiple contextual realities).
As education and schools are an intrinic part of society, I have been looking at the models derived from sociology as a means of characterising the African environment. As the dominant framework for analysing society in the 20th century, the functionalist paradigm is rooted in the sociology of regulation (as opposed to radical change paradigm), providing definitions of society in terms of its unity and cohesiveness and approaching its subject matter from an objective viewpoint. Functionalism is characterised by a concern for providing explanations for social order, integration, solidarity and actuality and is itself further delineated by the social-system theory (positivist) and interactionism (interpretist).
Social System theory builds on a biological analogy of holism, relationship between parts, structure, function and needs, treating the external world as a concrete reality, governed by observable functional relations amenable to scientific investigation through nomothetic methods. In this context, Malinowski identified the significance of functionality within social structures (units) whilst Radcliffe-Brown emphasised the significance of the relationship between functional units as the basis for structural continuity i.e the integrity of a society is maintained through the process of social life rather than the movement of individual members (entering or leaving).
Durkhiem suggested that the aim of a coherent society is conservation within the movement from a traditional to an industrial culture. Durkhiem (1938) saw traditional societies as being held together on the basis of a mechanical solidarity derived from the similarity of the associated parts, with the individuals conscience a simple appendage of the collective conscience (based on a system of shared, norms and beliefs) in all its movements. In contrast, Durkeim defined the industrial society with its extensive system of labour division and functional differentiation as a organic form arising from the interdependence of parts. Durkiem recognised that in the process of transition from traditional to industrial, social solidarity could breakdown. However, he saw this as an abnormal state of affairs and a deviation from the natural course of development.
In an extension to social system theory (positivist), von Bertalanffy (1956) promoted the study of systems (over physical events) identifying and exploring the difference between open (organismic analogy) and closed systems. Closed systems are deemed to be isolated from their environment and are characterised by equilibrium. Alternatively, open systems engage in transactions with their environment and change themselves in the process. An open system may achieve steady state but this is not a necessary condition. According to theory an organism represents a good example of an open system since it maintains itself through a (growth) process of exchange with its environment during the course of which there is a continuous build up and break-down of constituent parts.
Whilst it is accepted that an entirely closed (mechanical) system model would be limited in its representative of primary education deliver in the developing world, its is deemed a more suitable model for education in Africa (than the open system) on the basis of the following list of social/educational issues: 1) pan African literature has identified a clear delineation between contemporary schools and their surrounding environment, referred to as the formal and informal education systems. The informal education system is centred on the community and the development of the personal and vocational skills demanded within a traditional setting. In contrast, the state system represents a largely rational (positivist) development of the learning process based on goals of economic growth and national unity with little appreciation or consideration of traditional settings. 2) Progressive systems of education, centred on the child have not been successful in an African context. In contrast, the informal learning structure is based on an objective method of deference, observation, imitation and experience. Tedla even suggests that individual assertion based on personal knowledge, understanding and opinion is percieved as devisive and undisirable within the informal system. 3) At the level of the classroom, order and discipline is maintained by the use/threat of corporal punishment. The symbolic presence of the cane (and the curriculum) suggests that the meaning and values associated with the establishment are (externally) imposed on school children irrespective of individual opinions or the psychological impact.
As the literature indicates a entirely closed social system doesn’t exist, it is therefore appropriate to include an interpretist element as a means of accurately characterising the classroom environment. The subjective aspect to the research will be founded on the difference between the peer group environment and the conventional/formal school and listed as follows: 1) potential differences in Social, Economic status (SES) has been linked to school performance 2) differences in the education level of the parents. 3) many excluded children choose not to attend formal schools due to lack of relevance/interest i.e. a idiosyncratic view of education. 4) children will be taught by trained student-tutors rather than formal teachers. 5) There will be no threat of corporal punishment. 6) the limited curriculum and teaching time customised to the needs of the students.
Mid-way between the idealist view of society as a subjectively constructed entity (interactionist) and the objective mechanistic view, Mead states that the human being evolves through a social process of interaction that involves the development of language and hence the constructs of mind and self. Whilst Meads views are predicated upon the existence of an external reality which influences human thought and action, he rejects the notion of simple behaviourism recognising the role played by human beings in influencing their environment. It would appear that Meads objective relativism represents the pragmatists view of social construction.
In a practical sense, it is suggested that research invite each student and student-teacher to provide an individual opinion/account of needs and satisfaction in relation to the learning process. Though this is subjective element, the data could still be obtained using a survey method based on questionaires and interviews.