Tunisian Revolution 2

After a slightly faltering start with access to only one expensive private school the previous day, I was hoping for a much more productive session. Sirene arrived at the hotel with the driver at 8.30am and we met Hela at the El Omrane school about 10 mins away. Coincidently this was Helas old school, a place where she had been very happy by all accounts. She tells me that whilst it had been a school of very good repute in her day, the immediate area had suffered from some social decline. She therefore categorised the school as an L (lower middle class) rather than an M (middle class) as in years gone by. This was my first real look at the public school and my first impressions were very positive. The school is large, clean and well-ordered with no obvious signs of ill-discipline. You never know what to expect in so called developing countries but Tunisia (considered mid table in terms of HDI and EDI) is certainly not Ghana. We were welcomed by the Director who chatted about the old days for a while with Hela. Suddenly a couple of teachers appeared and we were well into our first interviews. The discussions were more than interesting and its clear that these teachers are no make-weights but well trained professionals.

In the absence of clear aims and guidelines from ASI, Im gonna simply present the work as a pilot study giving the opportunity for teachers to express there chief concerns prior to any further, more detailed research and potential reforms. Myself and Madame J (an English Teacher) talked for nearly an hour before the Director showed up around the school. The classrooms are large and but anodyne, it seems that there are no dedicated rooms and so no opportunity for teachers to customise the environment and make learning a more dynamic and interactive experience. None the less, the rooms were basically equipped and flexible i.e small desks allowing for movement in support of collaborative learning activities. The school is also a pilot school, one that caters for exceptional children from all over the country (with boarding facilities) and which every social class. The director showed us the Art room and some of the murals and painting done by the children, it was also noted that they are working on revolutionary themes, representations that of course were banned under the previous regime. Finally, we were taken to a typical science lab and I had the opportunity to talk for a short while to some students. They crowded around and were very enthusiastic to practice their English. They said they enjoyed school but that its an exhausting experience; too many subjects in the curriculum. This was a very encouraging start to the day and I was very grateful to the Director for dropping everything at short notice and showing me around. Next on the list were schools in Ettahdamen, a poor district that grew spontaneously as a result of increasing rural migration (similar to Aguablanca but with out the conspicuous violence). Like Aguablanca, first impressions are far from negative though solid middle-class types like Sirene and Hela see it differently. Yes, its a poor area but the housing is permanent, the roads are good and all the necessary services and utilities appear to be here. Unlike Cali however there isnt the intensity of violence and so far, no signs of wooden shacks and mountains of displaced people.

The first school was the local Upper Secondary school. The Director was a relatively young man, about my age, well dressed, professional and seemingly positive in a low key kind of way. Difficult to tell as all conversations are done in the local language which appears to be a hybrid of French and Arabic. He naturally was a little bit concerned about the superficial nature of my study so it was fortunately that I had prepared my pilot study spiel and got him to see the positive side of research (that actual registers stakeholder concerns rather than simply imposes ill-considered solutions on them). The teachers (three of them and none of them from language subjects) assembled and also gave me a little of the outsider treatment before agreeing to talk. On discussing the nature of education provision in marginalised districts, the Director pulled out a fist full of long-bladed knives recently confiscated from children on the school premises. It certainly focused attention on the local context and related social concerns. After this institution we remained in the marginalised zone and went to a similar school just down the road, though not on my original list. The Director introduced us to a couple of Language teachers (Italian and English). They didnt seem bothered in the slightest about my motives and happily passed on their concerns.

We made very good progress today and where we were not able to talk to teachers directly due to concerns about institutional instability resulting from a unique set of circumstances, we were able to leave both teacher and parent questionnaires. Naturally, this is not ideal research procedure but neither are these ideal research conditions, in terms of time and resource committed.

After a full day in the saddle, a broad pattern is beginning to emerge. Something like the following:

– Lack of coherence and flexibility in the curriculum. From vision, to objectives, to subjects, to themes, to methods, to materials to testing. All of it has been referenced as some time or other. Could be that the system was adopted to rapidly and without due consideration to context. More time is needed to clarify and embed the curriculum
– Priority schools are not given the priority they need in terms of support and resources in order to operate effectively
– Centralised control means that local Management are unable to solve directly manage their problems
– No authentic mechanism to encourage parental responsibility and avoid shifting the blame for social ills on the teacher.
– School leadership instability. The Directors of schools in Marginalised areas are changed regularly for whatever reason (3 or 4 per decade)

Many of the problems that undermine the public education system here are no doubt prevalent in the deliver of education (particularly in marginalised communities) across the entire world; with the exception of a certain instability created by the revolution and the radical adoption of a progressive agenda and related curriculum (from Canada). Many of the concerns that I will raise were supposed to have been addressed by the 2002 reform, though none of changes comes easy. After an inordinately long day (six schools visited), I finally get back to the ranch and take a breather and a couple of half decent movies on the telly. I just dont have the energy for a load of writing tonight

Tunisian Revolution 1

No one was on the street today as it was a Sunday and the market place is closed. The focus therefore was on my scheduled meeting with Hela, my guide and local school inspector. First success was to get my internet up and running thanks to the hotels maintenance man, strange how naked you feel without it. I introduced myself and reassured her that I had no axe to grind and no special agenda, she appeared particular pleased to know that I had taught myself and what not simply a medalling researcher. After having discussed my perception of the Tunisian system based on a limited Literature Review, we agreed that quality was the principle concern of education policy since the 2002 reforms and most particular, the secondary level of education. Furthermore, she agreed that the Basic Education curriculum was too congested with no time for sports and art subjects. The current curriculum is apparently based on the notion of integrated competencies (a list of can dos), a system originally imported from Canada that supports critical thinking, the development of life skills and technology all underpinned by a socially constructivist method. All of this is based on authentic Tunisian series of textbooks and appropriate teacher training. All sounds very impressive but it represented a radical departure from the previous system which was predominantly rote based. Hela believes that these reforms represent a positive step but they require more time (currently 9 years) to bed-in before positive results are forthcoming. However, it does appear to create great conflict for the teachers who are attempting to improve the pass rates amongst the students in order to satisfy parents and the authorities but struggling with a radically different pedagogy at the same time i.e. the system may be driven by product rather than process. Hela also insists that the progressive notion of Critical Thinking in no way conflicts with the authentic ontology/worldview of the Tunisian people which is very western in outlook while remaining conscious of their Muslim heritage.

With respect to organisation, the reforms were intended to provide for a decentralisation of education but it seems that this has not yet been reflected on the ground in terms of financial resources and tools within the schools. All in all, Tunisia finds itself at a critical moment in the educational lifecycle just at the time when significant political change is anticipated. Hela suggests that it is the businessmen and corporate leaders that are filling the political vacuum left by Ben Ali which would suggest that things will progress in a similar Eurocentric direction provided the right people win power at the 24th July elections. However she fears the rise of religious fundamentalism and the loss of the secular equality first established in 1956 on independence from France.

The day started somewhat slowly and inauspiciously as Brian attempted to seek further permission from the authorities to enter the specific list of secondary schools that I had identified for research. It certainly wasnt the flying start that I had hoped for but thats common in research, particularly when dealing with bureaucracy. Meanwhile, myself and Hela agreed to meet at 1.30pm and visit a adjacent pair of local independent school that she thought would be amenable to our uninvited approach. For the intervening hours, I started to prepare the final report (before I’d even started the study) and fill in a few of the contextual details not dependent on the data gathering process.

As Im now settled into the hotel, I often go down to the restaurant to write as its a more public environment and certainly more convivial than my room. As I was setting up my computer, I got talking to a lady at the opposite table. Fanta happens to work for the World Bank in Geneva but is here in Tunis for a job interview with the African Development Bank. She is originally from Guinea and is keen to return to Africa after many years in Europe, so naturally I took the opportunity to talk about my work here and the broader issues of education and private schools for the poor. She was very interested in the topic, gave me her card and asked me to keep in touch, particular if I was intending to do research in SSA. We exchanged cards and I gave a shout to Tooley and Dixon and the E.G.West website and lets hope we can remain in contact.

At the appointed hour, I met up with Hela and also Serine, my second assistant who works directly for Brian. Though I dont think she has any experience in the education system, she is multi-lingual and seemingly enthusiastic and lets be honest, I need all the help that I can get right now. Serine was on her way to the MoE with my list for approval but she was able to drop off the questionnaires and would attempt to catch us up later that afternoon. Meanwhile, Hela and myself headed up the road to this pair of independent schools. Both institutions were large, imposing and seemingly well-appointed, at least the reception areas gave very self-confident impression. This was not misplaced as apparently these are amongst the most prestigious of independent schools in the city. It seems neither of these institutions have subsided places for the poor but the story is not quite that simple. According to Hela, the state runs an additional set of Pilot schools for gifted children with entrance from across the social spectrum and purely based on exam performance and a supplementary entrance test. Hela indicated that the Pilot schools rightly, have a reputation as very demanding even for clever kids, though the curriculum does include art subjects and sport, something for which the public system simple doesnt have the time. Hela informed me that out of loyalty to the public system (within which she taught for 17 years), she didnt send her boy to the pilot school, though he was presented with the opportunity. This point appeared to be an opportune moment to ask about parental choice, an issue apparently close to her heart as she is unhappy with the secondary school that her daughter attends. It would appear that the system functions in the standard form. You are obliged to send your children to the local school and whilst there is a mechanism for appeal, the director has the final say over attendance, so naturally he only chooses the brightest children when faced with an inbox of applicants. Hela also confessed to having circumvented the system at primary level having used her parents address to get her kids into a good institution. All the common loopholes right.

We were pretty much fobbed off at the first school with the Director only agreeing to meet us by appointment and refusing to allow us access to the Teachers on the grounds that there was currently too much institutional instability in the aftermath of the revolution. However, we were met with a far more positive reception at the DAngola school. Whilst we didnt get to meet the Head directly, we were given time with his PA who supplied us with a good deal of information, took our questionnaires and promised a direct meeting with Teachers on Friday morning at 11.30. Despite the apparent privilege associated with this upper-middle class school, it seems appearances are deceptive. According to our informer, this posh institution was perceived as rebellious by the previous regime and Ben Ali was keen to establish a level of greater control over it; a battle he rather surprisingly has lost. We didnt have enough time to go into the nature of its subversive activities, however it seems that it supplemented the central curriculum with additional subjects such as Social Hygiene (which I interpreted as Social Justice), Environmental studies and Technology (including the Internet and Facebook). It also appeared to give relative freedom to the teachers in terms of classroom methods e.g. in languages classes the teacher could choose between communicative or grammar-based (linguistic) approaches to teaching. Hardly radical in broad terms but possibly significant within the local context. Furthermore, rather than use state language material, the school had purchased textbooks directly from country of origin i.e. English Books from Oxford University Press. Seems like a good idea at a superficial level but of course, students can struggle with material that doesnt suit the context of learning. Nonetheless, for an independent school to invest in this way may represent a negative critique of the Tunisia language textbooks. Through Hela, we provided a detailed description of the questionnaires before leaving our charming host to get on with her pressing schedule; a queue had already formed as a consequence of our unexpected arrival.

We departed having made our first kill and feeling much better about the world. Sirene also had a degree of success, the authorities having agreed to let us have access to public secondary schools, though only 5 of the original list of 20. Hardly ideal but thems the rules and Hela suggested that she also could use her connections to get access to other groups of teachers beyond those agreed. Once again, not ideal but you have to work within the given constraints. On the more positive side, I have convinced Hela that despite her reservations and safety concerns, we have to go to the poor districts of Kabaria and Ettadhaman in order to get a representative sample. So Serine has got us a driver and we start at 8am tomorrow with our first public school at El Omrane.

No Triangulation

Its been a long while since my blog entry but the delay has been significant, particularly in terms of my methodology. As previous entries will testify, I was very much inclined to use Conversation Analysis techniques as a means of characterising interaction between children within the SOLE. The degree of detail associated with this approach however was a consistent source of concern to me and at no point was I totally committed to CA as a research method. In fact, the singular reason I stuck to CA for such a protracted period of time was because of its notional links with learning and in particular, Second Language Acquisition (SLA). However in view of the micro-levels of detail required and the apparent distance from content and context, I didnt see how I could link CA with personal notions of change/progress in the realm of International Development, after that is what I do. Secondly, the children in Ghana will mostly be interacting in Fante, a language (and associated culture) that I dont understand. Hence valid interpretation of interaction would be very difficult to establish or sustain without ongoing support from a training interpreter. So I have decided to drop CA and have taken a more general approach to research, namely grounded theory and thematic analysis; remaining consistent with my post-structuralist stance.

The question however remains the same; how do children organise their learning in the absence of a teacher. Clearly, reading (as the principal English Acquisition skill) will play a significant part in this process (as learning is computer mediated). It is important to note however, that at this point I dont think it will be possible to test reading improvement. This is because nothing is known about student aims and the learning process itself (self-organised). Whilst it is strongly presumed that socio-cultural means will be adopted by the students to establish learning aims and strategies, one can only define related test objectives once the reading process is characterised. I currently believe that this is a post-doctoral activity and that SOLE exploration will not require any form of triangulation associated with positivist style testing.

Meanwhile, I think it is vital (in self organising terms) not to impose any form of agenda on the young participants i.e. I want to avoid prescribed learning in relation to the Ghanaian curriculum. Though curcumventing any contradiction with the principal research aims, it does creates potential practical issues in relation to access (to marginalised children). It my intention therefore to go to Ghana during the school term and set up a pitch in the street for local hawkers and street children only (other childern being in school). The computers will be accessible all day but only eight children will have access to two computers at any one time. How the children organise themselves (who turns up and when, who works with who etc) over this period of time will be an central theme of the anaylsis. The essential problem will be identifying which specific periods of data to analyse in detail. Some sort of selection criteria will be required. I will also need to put my plan to supervisors, the panel and Ken to see if it is feasible.

CA taster

I’ve started the courses associated with Discourse Analysis (DA) both of which appear to be related to the SLA classroom with the Seedhouse lesson providing what appears to be a detailed examination of Conversation Analysis (CA). What is interesting from the additional readings (Doelher)is the clear distinction between classic CA (learning) and the Language Development CA (acquisition of a second language). Whilst CA is understood as a continually unfolding development of context, language development is conceptualised as progress made over the long term (a longitudinal study). Alternatively, classic CA is a means of characterising the process of learning in the short term through modes of participation and the associated rules of interaction.

Furthermore, SLA has been conceptualised in 2 forms. The first follows the linguistic/cognitive/psychological paradigm (SLA is achieved through a collection of integrated mental processes) while the alternative is an interactional/social paradigm. CA clearly sits in the interactional paradigm though according to Myles (2010) their is room for a combination of the 2 approaches. Not sure how possible this is as they appear to be along diametrically-opposed research paradigms.

According to Psathas, Conversation analysis contrasts with the linguistic approach in that it is an unmotivated examination of interaction. Whilst CA necessitates a framework of analysis, it doesnt apriori define modes of interaction. The following guidelines (as opposed to rules) for analysis have been proposed by Ten Have (1999):

1. Development an empirical account of interaction
a. actions accomplished (what was achieved)
b. a grounding of the account in the reality of the participants (what was said)
c. an explanation of how an utterance led to social action (the link between a and b)

2. Preparatory Routine (Schegloff)
a.Identify patterns of turn-taking within the spoken episode (interaction). Take particular note of disturbances in fluent operation (deviance)
b. Look for sequences, particularly adjacent pairs
c. Look for repair

3. Analysis
a. Select a sequence where interaction sequence is opened and subsequently closed.
b. Characterise actions in the sequence. Describe actions on a turn-by-turn basis (pairs, repair)
c. Note the packaging of actions in terms of reference and content (form and delivery of action and preferences)
d. Interpret actions in terms of turn-taking and timing
e. Actions implicate identity and roles. Whilst the CA paradigm implies that reality is under continual negotiation and construction (in the moment), interaction can nonetheless be related to the rights, obligations and expectations of the participants within a framework of relatively fixed social notions of identity and role. Examples include institutional relations such as teacher/pupil, employer/employee even parent/child.

According to Ten Have there are 4 types of interactional organisation.
1. Turn Taking Organisation. According to Sacks, Turn-Taking is locally managed (turn by turn), party administered (by the participants themselves) and interactionally managed (subject to recipient design, talk is constructed in ways that are sensitive to the receivers). Turn-Taking itself is orientated around TCU (Turn Construction Unit) and the points at which transition of speakership occurs (or is possible). The principle focus of analysis associated with each TCU is; why that and why now.
2. Sequence Organisation
3. Repair Organisation
4. Organisation of Turn-construction design

CA or not CA. This is the Question

This has been my first full day in operating in the paradiagm of conversation analysis. Having read a number of articles and the Seedhouse book, I have a general idea of the purpose of CA, however I’m remain unsure about its applicability to my research. The first issue is related to context.
Whilst CA is explicitly free from context (unless expressed within the dialogue), my work is specifically associated with development and education and the notion (in a very general sense) of progress/learning/awareness of children within developing/marginalised communities. Unfortunately, this level of social/political consciousness will almost certainly not become prevalent within a few hours of SOLE exposure. In fact, the notion of marginalisation may not even be apparent to the young participants (age 9-12) within their own sphere of consciousness. At this stage in the research therefore, the CA paradigm would be limited to extracting the specific meaning of SOLE to Ghanaian children. In which case, the analysis would be effectively limited to Identity as opposed to any learning objectives (including that of SLA) i.e. what do the children do when faced with the computer, how do they organised themselves, how do they navigate the tool, how do they obtain intersubjectivity etc. The question is therefore, in such a constrained domain of research, will Ghanaian children demonstrate behaviour that is in any way different from children in the developing world. Would it be better to characterise SOLE behaviour at home before attempting to do it abroad.

In summary, a dedicated CA approach will provide a very detailed description of the mechanisms of interaction but it is debatable whether it should be used to reveal moments of learning/development or causal relationship expected from the SOLE. I would therefore presume that the CA techniques applied to SLA (with its clear emphasis on learning) could be used to clarify this apparent epistemological issue of method.

Furthermore, the SOLE has been defined for groups (with the potential for a number of computers). This raises basic ethnomethodogocal questions about how I capture (audiable and video) this extremely complicated environment in its entirity, how do I synchronise talk to computer interaction and how to I select data in order to extract a managable and meaningful quantity. Needlesstosay, analysis at the micro-level is detailed and complicated and of limited use (and this stage) in relation to development.

Alternatively, Adam referenced the research of Ben Rampton (Crossing and Language in Late Modernity) and the application of Interactional Socio-Linguistics (IS) in relation to childs play (very relavant to SOLE). Whilst not going into any great detail, this approach operates at the level of CA but employes aspects of ethnography as a means of including context within the research domain. Also related is the work of Goodwin and Goodwin (interaction with artifacts) and the range of different approaches identified withint the Handbook of Lnaguage and Social Interaction. More than enough to be getting on with!!

Conversational Analysis

Toward the tail end of last year on an open invitation to all Education PG students, I went to a seminar on Identity. Numerous PhD students presented their research projects including related themes as varied as Turkish dating shows, the Armed Forces and TEFL teacher training. Though not obviously related to my areas of investigation, Dr Alan Firth who organised the gathering showed a distinct interest in my project and suggested we had a meeting. Having described the scope and identified the paradigm conflict associated with comparative education, Alan acknowledged the problem and suggested that I ignore the positivist approach and focus completely on the SOLE. Furthermore, I should use Conversational Analysis (CA) as a means of investigating student interaction, emergent meaning, learning mechanisms and outcomes and identity and so on. In view of its eminent potential as a research method, I have undertaken a quick review of descriptive material including The Interactional Architecture of the Language Classroom (Seedhouse).
CA is positioned within the interpretative paradigm and is aligned with the research principles that underpin ethnomethodology namely:
– Indexicality. Participants display through their utterances which aspects of the context they are oriented towards at any given time i.e. CA is context free
– The Documentary Method of Interpretation. The treatment of any actual real-world as a document/reference of previously known pattern
– The Reciprocity of Perspectives.
– Normative Accountability
– Reflexivity
According to Seedhouse, the principal aims of CA include: to characterise the organisation (emic logic) of interaction and to trace the development of intersubjectivity in an action sequence (though not in terms of psychological states). The essential question asked at all stages of CA of data is – Why that, in that way, right now.

The organisations are part of a context-free structure used to orientate ourselves in indexical interaction i.e. to interpret the context sensitive social actions of others. The principal organisational components of the CA interaction are listed as follows:
– Adjacent Pairs: The basic building blocks of intersubjectivity (common understanding). Consists of paired utterances where the response of the second becomes conditionally relevant in relation to the first i.e. the first interaction is a template which creates a normative expectation for a subsequent action and a template for interpreting it.
– Preference Organisation: That the interaction is organised and managed by the partcipants (social actors) towards social goals. Similar in concept to Grice co-operative principle (which can contain a dispreferred action)
– Turn Taking: A intrinsic part of standard conversation, turn-taking is organised in terms of norms which the participants can select.
– Repair: The treatment of trouble occuring in interactive language use. Trouble in this context is anything which the participants judge is impeding communication.

It is important to note however that CA does not see findings of interactional organisation as fixed sets of prescriptive rules. Rather they are constitutive norms or interpretive resources which interactants make use of in order to orientate themselves within and to make sense of an ongoing interaction.

White Mythologies

White Mythologies: Writing History and the West (Young, 1990)

The essence of the book is to assess the historical authenticity, specifically colonial and post colonial periods. Young provides a broad context using Marxist theory of History (influenced by Hegels Master/Slave dialectic), representing a contiguous phenomena characterised by production and class (with specific focus on the social position, perception, language and the revolutionary potential of the working class). The Marxist critique is howevee perceived as limited in relation to post-colonial theory on the basis that it fails to recognise marginalised groups, particularly the poor and ethnic minorities. Furthermore, this rational approach to history emerged from the enlightenment period centred in Europe and resulting in a Eurocentric view of science, scientific investigation and knowledge. In the sense that History has been defined from a specific perspective, it could be described as lop-sided and subjective or even, in the context of post-colonial theory, racist and oppressive. On this basis, Foucault denies the validity of a single definition of History and the authority of any single source, specifically Western cultures (through Historicism) claim to universal authority. The principal and defining characteristic of post-colonial theory is the neutralisation of the other (minority culture) by the dominant power and associated culture.

The post-structuralist approach to History questions western thought and its assumptions suggesting that all knowledge may be contaminated and that the associated ontology amounts to a philosophy of power. The deconstruction (Derrida) of European thought has no pretensions to the universal in the form of meta-narrative.

Alternatively, Jameson argues for a single history that can be characterised in terms of colonialism. In a unified Marxist critique, Jameson suggests that the Third World represents a dialectical opposite of a post-modern European thought and the potential centre of future resistance to existing orders of knowledge and power (Fanon)

.

The post-colonial critique questions the fundamental structures of Western knowledge on which the description of history is founded. The humanism promoted by the west ignores the reality for the other and ultimately provides justification for colonialism and the superiority of the white man as part of the process of civilisation. This was profoundly illustrated by Said () in the colonial definition of the Orient who illustrated the characterisation of the exotic and mysterious other through a range of social, economic and political instruments that ultimately justified the colonisation of the region. At this point Young, specifically addresses the problem of method in a critique of Saids work. Firstly, Young identifies the presumed difficulty of administering a colony when the scholarly representation of the Orient clashes so dramatically with reality. Secondly, Said has difficulty reconciling a singular account of history with the universal. Thirdly, Said appears to employ the meta-narrative with a paradoxical tendency to employ the Euro-centric approach to the analysis of power and knowledge (Bhabah). Despite the inherent difficulties associated with authentic research i.e. can a European white man ever understand racism without the experience, Spivak recommends an objective approach based on an unlearning of privileged whilst accepting and acknowledging the researchers personal complicity in the production of knowledge.

Notes for the Panel

Notes in relation to my first panel presentation on Monday 15th Nov. Apart from the quantity of information that I can deliver within the 15 min time limit (remembering that the TARF presentation required 3 hours), additional points of concern include the following:

1) Social System theory – a largely positivist approach to the characterisation of the development of society and social life. While Traditional African societies tend toward the closed end of the spectrum (society is mechanical and individual needs are subordinate to the group), the entire paradigm is based on a rational, scientific understanding of society. This form of assumption may not be appropriate when defining African society as the entire understanding of knowledge and knowledge acquisition (the informal education system) appears to be diametrically opposed to that of the west and the formal education system i.e school operates in broad isoation from its surroundings, a point emphasised by Tedla.

2) The paradigm differential within the classroom between (top-down) communicative approach and the (bottom up) linguistic approach. Reading could provide a coherent and cogent link between the different approaches. Furthermore, the acquisition of phonics can be readily linked with improved reading ability as potential assessed using the BURT (or equivalent) reading test. On the basis that reading ability has been improved (as a basis for knowledge aquisition) further testing could be applied to test cognitive understanding.

3) Currently there are a broad number of test areas; cognitive, affective, reading and computer literacy. Should the number of test objectives be rationalised.

Observations from the panel members are listed as follows:

1) Clarify the research objectives as a means ensuring that the research is sufficiently original. Whilst a change in research context is not perceived as providing sufficient contrast, there is little evidence to suggest much comparative educational research in a developing world environment.

2) Furthermore, the methodology associated with the SOLE is currently perceived as insufficiently resilient and requiring additional transparency linked to a clear ontology and epistemology.

3) The panel members indicated that a method limited to an assessment of outcomes is considered inadequate i.e whilst learning objectives may be satisfied, there will be no understanding of the learning process. It is suggested that some form of dialogue analysis be considered as a means of interpreting interaction between participants. A bibliography will be provided as a means of determining the most appropriate approach to analysis in the given context.

Promoting Reading

According to Greaney (1996) and his study of reading (promotion) in the developing world, literacy is a definitive indicator of human development. Without the ability to read, people are denied access to pertinent information about health, social, cultural and political issues and well as pleasure and enrichment. According to Greaney, literacy is positively correlated with primary and secondary school enrolment, newspaper production and life expectancy.

Having established literacy and reading as principle pedagogical and research aims consistent with international (MDG) and nation objectives, the next step is to develop a coherent research method and design. The principal issue confronting method in the context of this research relates to the distinct differences in learning paradigms between the formal (grammar based, bottom-up) approach and the informal SOLE (communicative based, top-down) approach. The ability to read is viewed as the preferred bridge between the learning paradigms not only because of its significance in relation to the standard curriculum but also because of its relevance to the SOLE environment (mediation tool between technology and knowledge). Furthermore, phonics awareness has been positively correlated with reading and literacy ability. Phonics is not only a focus of Paulines work but could easily provide a focus for learning in all of the classroom environments associated with the research.

When comparing literacy ability in a large scale research programme covering 32 education systems throughout the world, Thorndyke (1973) identified the following salient factors believed to characterise the achievement difference in literacy levels (it should be noted that the study accounted for difference in Human Development Indices as a means of permitting a relative and fair comparison).

1. Library size
2. Frequent silent reading
3. More teaching time
4. More reading tests
5. More female teachers
6. Years of teacher training

Communicative Language Testing

The notion of communicative competence is broad and needs to be fully understood before being considered as a basis for a research testing regime. As previously indicated assessment can be viewed in terms of two distinct paradigms as follows: 1) The Psychometric-Structuralist era: Testing is based on discrete linguistic points related to four language skill areas, reading, writing, speaking and listening. Additionally there is the Psycholinguistic-Sociolinguistic era: Integrative tests were conceived in response to the language proficiency limitations associated with discrete point testing. According to Oller (in Weir, 1988), Integrative testing could measure the ability to integrate disparate language skills in ways that more closely resembled the actual process of language use. The communicative paradigm is founded on the notion of competence. According to Morrow (in Weir, 1988; pp8) communicative language testing should be concerned with :1) what the learner knows about the form of the language and how to use it appropriately in context (Competence). 2) the extent to which the learner is able to demonstrate this knowledge in a meaningful situation (Performance) i.e what can he do with the language. Performance testing should therefore be representative of a real-life situation where an integration of communicative skills is required. The performance test criteria should relate closely to the effective communication of ideas in that context. Weir emphasises the importance of context and related tasks as an important dimension in communicative (performance) language assessment (ibid, pp11). In conclusion a variety of tests different tests are required for a range of different purposeds and the associated instruments are no longer uniform in content or method.

In recognising the broad definitions of communication, Carroll (Testing Communicative Performance, 1980) adopts a rationalist approach to test requirement definition. The basis of the methodology therefore is a detailed analysis including the identification of events and activities (communication functions) that drive the communicative need. Having identified the test requirements, they are divided between the principle communicative domains of speaking, listening, writing and reading. This approach is no doubt reminiscent of the requirements definition related to English for Specific Purposes (ESP) i.e functional language appropriate for Tourist, Students, Lawyers etc. However, this strategy (and associated methodology) would seem inappropriate in the given research context for the following salient reasons:

1. No practical to undertake a meaningful needs analysis for all participants
2. The entirely process is far too complex and labour intensive
3. ESP is not aimed at marginalised communities or children

Sabria and Samer (other students) have pointed me in the direction of Cambridge ToEFL exams (conformant with the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages) as a potential basis for communicative testing. The tests are divided into the 4 principal language dimensions (Speaking, Listening, Writing and Reading) and provide tests and marking criteria at all levels of competency including that for the research context (Young Learners English – YLE starters).