{"id":379,"date":"2022-07-07T10:48:31","date_gmt":"2022-07-07T09:48:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/opening-research\/?page_id=379"},"modified":"2023-02-14T11:42:43","modified_gmt":"2023-02-14T11:42:43","slug":"reproducibilitea","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/opening-research\/reproducibilitea\/","title":{"rendered":"ReproducibiliTea Journal Club"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<div class=\"wp-block-image\"><figure class=\"aligncenter size-medium\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" width=\"300\" height=\"292\" src=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/opening-research\/files\/2022\/07\/reproducibiltea-logo-300x292.jpg\" alt=\"\" class=\"wp-image-380\" \/><\/figure><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p>Join us at the <a href=\"https:\/\/reproducibilitea.org\/\">ReproducibiliTea<\/a> journal club for an informal discussion about how we can improve transparency, reproducibility&nbsp;and openness in research &#8211; with tea (and other refreshments)!  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>We welcome staff and research students working in any discipline, regardless of experience or expertise. &nbsp;  <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>The programme of events is set out below, together with article underpinning the theme for each month. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link\" href=\"https:\/\/forms.office.com\/r\/X6LSJswZF3\">register your interest<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\"><strong>Venue<\/strong><\/h2>\n\n\n\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.ncl.ac.uk\/library\/visiting-the-library\/philip-robinson-library\/\">Philip Robinson Library<\/a> Committee room (Level 1). Signposted from the library reception desk. Participants not on campus will also be able to join via zoom. <\/p>\n\n\n\n<h2 class=\"wp-block-heading\">Programme for 2022\/23<\/h2>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:15px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-group\"><div class=\"wp-block-group__inner-container is-layout-flow wp-block-group-is-layout-flow\">\n<p><strong>1. Analytical flexibility illustrated&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>October 20<sup>th<\/sup> 2022, 12.00 &#8211; 13.00<\/strong> <\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Ioannidis JPA (2005) Why Most Published Research Findings Are False. <em>PLoS Med 2(8)<\/em>: e124. h<a href=\"\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020124\">ttps:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pmed.0020124<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:15px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>2. Scientific originality through the historical lens&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>November 17<sup>th<\/sup> 2022, 12.00 &#8211; 13.00 <\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Wagenmakers\u2009, E.-J., Dutilh, G., &amp; Sarafoglou, A. (2018). The Creativity-Verification Cycle in Psychological Science: New Methods to Combat Old Idols. <em>Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13<\/em>(4), 418\u2013427. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691618771357\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/1745691618771357<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:15px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>3. Replicating landmark studies<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>December 15<sup>th<\/sup> 2022, 12.00 &#8211; 13.00 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Klein, Richard A., et al. (2018) Many labs 2: investigating variation in replicability across sample and setting. <em>Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science. 1<\/em>(4), 443-490. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2515245918810225\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2515245918810225<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:15px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>4. The case for Open Access&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong><s>February 16<sup>th<\/sup> 2023, 12.00 &#8211; 13.00 <\/s><\/strong> <strong>Postponed due to strike action (new date TBC)<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Tennant JP, Waldner F, Jacques DC et al. The academic, economic and societal impacts of Open Access: an evidence-based review [version 3; referees: 4 approved, 1 approved with reservations]. <em>F1000Research<\/em> 2016, <em>5<\/em>:632. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12688\/f1000research.8460.3\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.12688\/f1000research.8460.3<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:15px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>5. Best practices in using technology in research<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>March 16<sup>th<\/sup> 2023 , 12.00 &#8211; 13.00<\/strong> &nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Wilson G, Bryan J, Cranston K, Kitzes J, Nederbragt L, et al. (2017) Good enough practices in scientific computing. <em>PLOS Computational Biology 13<\/em>(6), <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pcbi.1005510\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1371\/journal.pcbi.1005510<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:15px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>6. Replication \u2013 important or not?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>April 20<sup>th<\/sup> 2023, 12.00 &#8211; 13.00 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Zwaan, R. A., Etz, A., Lucas, R. E., &amp; Donnellan, B. (2018, August 1). Making Replication Mainstream. Preprint. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/4tg9c\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/4tg9c<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:15px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>7. Measurement Crisis in the making&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>May 18<sup>th<\/sup> 2023, 12.00 &#8211; 13.00 <\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Hussey, I., &amp; Hughes, S. (2018, November 19). Hidden invalidity among fifteen commonly used measures in social and personality psychology. Preprint. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/7rbfp\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.31234\/osf.io\/7rbfp<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:15px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>8. Responding to errors in a fallible science&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/strong>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n\n\n\n<p><strong>June 15<sup>th<\/sup> 2023, 12.00 &#8211; 13.00 <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Dorothy, V., D. (2018). Fallibility in Science: Responding to Errors in the Work of Oneself and Others. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1(3), 432\u2013438. <a href=\"https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2515245918776632\">https:\/\/doi.org\/10.1177\/2515245918776632<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<div style=\"height:15px\" aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"wp-block-spacer\"><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n\n\n\n<div class=\"wp-block-buttons is-layout-flex wp-block-buttons-is-layout-flex\">\n<div class=\"wp-block-button\"><a class=\"wp-block-button__link\" href=\"https:\/\/forms.office.com\/r\/X6LSJswZF3\">register your interest<\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Join us at the ReproducibiliTea journal club for an informal discussion about how we can improve transparency, reproducibility&nbsp;and openness in research &#8211; with tea (and other refreshments)! We welcome staff and research students working in any discipline, regardless of experience or expertise. &nbsp; The programme of events is set out below, together with article underpinning &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/opening-research\/reproducibilitea\/\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">ReproducibiliTea Journal Club<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":5778,"featured_media":0,"parent":0,"menu_order":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","template":"","meta":{"footnotes":""},"class_list":["post-379","page","type-page","status-publish","hentry"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/opening-research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/379","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/opening-research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/opening-research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/opening-research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/5778"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/opening-research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=379"}],"version-history":[{"count":19,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/opening-research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/379\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":509,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/opening-research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/pages\/379\/revisions\/509"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/opening-research\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=379"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}