{"id":1526,"date":"2002-01-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2002-01-12T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/wptest\/2002\/01\/12\/human-knowledge-and-power\/"},"modified":"2002-01-12T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2002-01-12T00:00:00","slug":"human-knowledge-and-power","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/2002\/01\/12\/human-knowledge-and-power\/","title":{"rendered":"Human Knowledge and Power"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u2018Among all the mutations that have affected the knowledge of things and their order, the knowledge of identities, differences, characters, equivalences, words . . . only one, that which began a century and a half ago and is now perhaps drawing to a close, has made it possible to for the figure of man to appear . . . It was the effect of a change in the fundamental arrangements of knowledge. As the archaeology of our thought easily shows, man is an invention of recent date. And one perhaps nearing its end,\u2019 (Foucault, 1966, p422). \u2018Power and knowledge directly imply one another . . . there is no power relation without the correlative constitution of a field of knowledge, nor any knowledge that does not presuppose and constitute at the same time power relations,\u2019 (Foucault, 1977, p27). Titles: 1) Is it possible for knowledge to exist independently from changes occurring throughout the history of humans? 2) Is it possible to have a shared system of knowledge, such as education, without the autonomy of the individual being destroyed? Concepts: By studying the ways of thought before and after the rise of science it is clear to see how much the \u2018knowledge\u2019 of the world has actually changed throughout time; ideas previously held to be true, and upon which many based their beliefs about reality, were disproved with new perspectives of gaining truth. If knowledge is continuously changing then how is it ever possible to say that anyone knows anything? If this is not possible then what is the aim of education, to bring autonomy or control? Objectives: \u00b7 To show how theories about knowledge have changed throughout time, with particular reference to Foucault\u2019s idea that knowledge is dependent upon the system of thought in a period of time. \u00b7 To question whether knowledge exists merely as persisting human self-delusion; humans need to feel that they are able to understand the world otherwise there is no possibility of controlling it. \u00b7 To apply these ideas to the educational system, questioning whether its aim is to encourage autonomous thinking within individuals, or whether it is merely a means of encouraging a stable society through control of what the individual is able to \u2018know\u2019 about the world. \u00b7 To apply Foucault\u2019s idea of \u2018power\/knowledge\u2019 to \u2018Life After George,\u2019 a play illustrating the idea that humans, although enjoying the idea of being free, actually feel more autonomous in a society where their ideas and actions are placed under the control of others. Main Sources: Foucault, M, 1966, \u2018The Order of Things \u2013 An Archaeology of the Human Sciences,\u2019 Tavistock\/Routledge, Guildford Foucault, M, 1977, \u2018Discipline and Punish,\u2019 Allen Lane, London Rayson, H, 2001, \u2018Life After George,\u2019 Nick Hern Books Limited, London<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Hannah Perkins, 2002, Stage 3<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8792,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[389,22,123],"tags":[44,305,394],"class_list":["post-1526","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-389","category-abstracts","category-stage-3-abstracts","tag-foucault","tag-knowledge","tag-power"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1526","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8792"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1526"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1526\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1526"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1526"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1526"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}