{"id":1586,"date":"2004-01-12T00:00:00","date_gmt":"2004-01-12T00:00:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/localhost\/wptest\/2004\/01\/12\/dreams-sleeping-and-paralogy-whose-dream-are-we-in\/"},"modified":"2004-01-12T00:00:00","modified_gmt":"2004-01-12T00:00:00","slug":"dreams-sleeping-and-paralogy-whose-dream-are-we-in","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/2004\/01\/12\/dreams-sleeping-and-paralogy-whose-dream-are-we-in\/","title":{"rendered":"Dreams, Sleeping and Paralogy: whose dream are we in?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Part One \u2013 Knowledge of the Unconscious  In what way is the unconscious knowable, an object available to knowledge? A look at the analogies Freud uses to describe psychoanalysis as a method capable of producing knowledge, and analysis as cure through knowledge. In what ways does the notion of the unconscious make ideas about a monogamous knowledge of (and authority on) itself problematical? Do I know, or am I paranoid? (Sources: Freud, Kant)  Part Two \u2013 Lyotard, Knowledge, and Paralogy  Drawing on the work of Lyotard we can sketch out an account of the unconscious as an effect of phrases. The human as a node, or knot, in a complex of relations that pre-exist her \u2013 as embedded. What is the place of the affect in the work of Lyotard, and where does he place it? The move to psychoanalysis as flirtation \u2013 the promiscuous movement among beds. (Sources: The Postmodern Condition, The Differend, The Inhuman)  Part Three \u2013 Practise in Paralogy, Paralogy in Practise  Using the findings of part two we can offer an account of why Adam Phillips writes the way he writes that turns around the work of Lyotard. Is Phillips the last psychoanalytic writer (is he a psychoanalytic writer?)? Has promiscuity brought about the end of the psychoanalytic relationship? The replacement of psychoanalysis as epistemology by psychoanalysis as ethos. (Sources: Lyotard, Adam Phillips, Jacqueline Rose, D.W.Winnicott)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>James Kaufman, 2004, Stage 2<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8792,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[413,22,128],"tags":[32,85,424],"class_list":["post-1586","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-413","category-abstracts","category-stage-2-abstracts","tag-freud","tag-lyotard","tag-sleep"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1586","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8792"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=1586"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1586\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=1586"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=1586"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blogs.ncl.ac.uk\/philosophy\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=1586"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}