Tag Archives: NCBS
OHD_FRM_0252 Takedown request form
OHD_RPT_0250 NCBS sensitivity check doc
OHD_RPT_0249 NCBS Takedown and alterations policy
OHD_GRP_0261 What is Archives at NCBS?
OHD_WRT_0257 Possible activities and outputs of placement at NCBS
Summary of placement activities and planned outcomes
Original:
During this placement I am looking to do a critical investigation in the past, present, and possible future culture of the archive at NCBS. I will have meetings with current members of staff and others who have previously been part of the archives’ eco system. The main aim of this placement is to look at how an archival habitus is established and how it might be enhanced and supported through the systems and processes of the archive. I will also engage with the day-to-day activities of the archive, which will include experiencing the day-to-day collection of archival materials and public engagement projects.
Levels of Access
If Archives at NCBS is thinking of scaling up and moving material online there are several issues to consider, especially when expanding public access such as, data protection, copyright, the format of the material, to name but a few. And because there are so many factors, different archival material will require different levels of access. I am interested in, how decisions are made about levels of access are and how access is assigned [GS1] to archival materials. Access to oral histories can be especially tricky. I believe tackling this issue will involve identifying the different spaces where people can access material, what the terms and conditions are for each of these spaces, and a matrix which helps categorise where individual archival material can be put.
Institutional memory and the grant cycle
More than 60 students and professionals coming from a variety of career backgrounds and age groups have worked within the walls of Archives at NCBS. This richness of diversity has made the Archives into the innovative and open space it is today. However, this situation does have its drawbacks especially in combination with the grant cycle. A grant often requires things to be achieved within a set time limit, meaning you want to waste as little time as possible. You do not want the new intern spending a lot of time learning all the unexpected quirks of the Archive, exploring ideas that have already been tested, or establishing relationships already established by their predecessors. So how do you avoid losing time? How do you transfer institutional memory from one intern to the next? This is something I would like to explore and attempt to find solutions which help people pick where others left off allowing the Archive to work more efficiently within the grant cycle.
The Archives at NCBS and NUOHUC collaboration project[GS2]
This is probably something to be explored further down the line when certain meetings have been had. From what I have deduced from the few conversations I have had about this project; some thought needs to go into what exactly will be collected. This includes archival material, as there has been mention of getting oral history participants to draw, and legal material as there might be cases where participants are unable to read certain forms. I am happy to contribute my thoughts to this project as I am interested in the relationship between the producers of archival material and the archive.
[GS1]Unsure if this is what you mean…
[GS2]Excellent points
OHD_BLG_0254 Blog post on the first month at NCBS
From a lively archive in Bangalore
Between indulging in delicious food and gandering around the stunning campus of the National Centre of Biological Sciences (NCBS), I sit at a hot desk in the basement where the Archives at NCBS is housed. The term ‘basement’ is slightly misleading as the sun shines through windows which face a sunken outdoor amphitheatre, where I can watch paradise birds flirt with each other in the trees. When not distracted by birds or food, my attention might be drawn away from my work by one of the eleven other people working in the Archive. It is the loudest archive I have ever been in, even when I discount the constant humming of the air conditioning. It is also the most welcoming workplace I have ever worked in. The Archives at NCBS is a hub of multidisciplinary folk, all coming together to build this archive, which is still very much in its infancy, celebrating its fourth birthday on this month. Therefore, a lot of the work is focused on growing the archive, with some team members creating a digital catalogue, others expanding the collection, and many involved in developing the various work flows necessary to keep an archive running.
This development of workflows, which I am also playing a role in, is necessary because, like so many organisations in the GLAM (galleries, libraries, archives and museums) sector, the Archives at NCBS is working within the grant cycle. This automatically leads to a lack of consistency under the staff and therefore creates a somewhat unsettled work environment. From February 2019 to February 2023, around 60 interns have passed through the archives’ doors. When I started my conversations with the head of the archives about doing my placement here, the archives team was three people. Now it has grown to twelve, including two archivists, a software developer, various artists in residence and an outreach team. There are also several other researchers who use the Archives’ reading room and offices to work in. What I am witnessing within the walls of the NCBS basement is how the sudden expansion and change within the archive is causing some growing pains. These growing pains should not be considered a negative, but as part of the natural process of building an organisation. They are what is motivating the development of various workflows.
Developing these workflows is necessary because, while the previous team of three were easily able to know exactly what the others were doing, the current members of the archive team are slightly less sure, even though they are all in the same room. By creating workflows, the workers of the archive, new, old, temporary, and permanent, will be supported in their work, allowing the larger work of the archive to be carried easily through the grant cycles and revolving door of many interns. However, this is not an easy task, especially when everyone still needs to carry out their day-to-day work alongside the workflow development. I am, therefore, doing my bit by creating the archives’ notice and takedown workflow. I am looking into how the archives can edit, redact, and remove archival material and capturing this process in a way which is helpful for users of the archives and present and future archivists.
While overall my first month in India has been delightful; filled with lovely weather, delicious food, and a group of generous and considerate co-workers, I will admit it took me some time to find my feet in the work at the archive. At first it was not clear what I should be doing, but now, with the development of the takedown workflow, I have been given direction, and am glad to be here to help the archive through this unsteady and nebulous time. The Archives at NCBS might not know exactly what it is doing right now, but that is okay; no one really knows what they are going to be at the age of four.