Does a selection interview predict year 1 performance in dental school?

JANICE ELLIS J-PEGruth_valentine

  1. McAndrew (Cardiff University), J.Ellis, and R.A. Valentine have had a paper published in the European Journal of Dental Education (ISSN 1396-5883).

Read on for the abstract or contact either janice.ellis@ncl.ac.uk or ruth.valentine@ncl.ac.uk directly for further details.

Abstract

It is important for dental schools to select students who will complete their degree and progress on to become the dentists of the future. The process should be transparent, fair and ethical and utilise selection tools that select appropriate students. The interview is an integral part of UK dental schools student selection procedures.

Objective: This study was undertaken in order to determine whether different interview methods (Cardiff with a multiple mini interview and Newcastle with a more traditional interview process) along with other components used in selection predicted academic performance in students.

Methods: The admissions selection data for two dental schools (Cardiff and Newcastle) were collected and analysed alongside student performance in academic examinations in Year 1 of the respective schools. Correlation statistics were used to determine whether selection tools had any relevance to academic performance once students were admitted to their respective Universities.

Results: Data was available for a total of 177 students (77 Cardiff and 100 Newcastle). Examination performance did not correlate with admission interview scores at either school; however UKCAT score was linked to poor academic performance.

Discussion: Although interview methodology does not appear to correlate with academic performance it remains an integral and very necessary part of the admissions process. Ultimately schools need to be comfortable with their admissions procedures in attracting and selecting the calibre of students they desire.

 

Educator Innovator Award 2016

Clare GuildingDr Clare Guilding (SME) has been awarded the ASME Educator Develop Group (EDG) Educator Innovator Award 2016.  Clare’s submission was titled ‘Interactive high-fidelity patient simulations delivered to large group pre-clinical medical cohorts in the lecture theatre.’ 

The Judges were very impressed with the way the author had innovatively taken established technologies and combined them to make a routine lecture exciting, interactive and engaging with appropriate consideration of educational theory.

Clare will be presenting her paper at the ‘What’s Hot’ session at the ASME ASM, 6th – 8th July 2016, Belfast.

 

Maryanne Freer awarded HE Senior Fellow Status

maryanne freerCongratulations to Dr Maryanne Freer (School of Medical Education), who has been awarded Higher Education Academy Senior Fellow Status. An HEA fellowship is an international recognition of a commitment to professionalism in teaching and learning in higher education. A Senior fellowship indicates an additional strong track record in management. Having gained a lectureship with the School in 1996, Maryanne became a Senior Academic Tutor before progressing to lead the MBBS, phase 1 , Patients, Doctors and Society Unit and being the course director for MBBS stage 4, Patient, Doctors and Society. In addition to her clinical academic work, Maryanne is a NHS senior manager and leads a national programme in post graduate GP medical education. Maryanne clinically practices as a psychiatrist.

Our new FMS faculty liaison in LTDS

graeme boxwellI am currently working in the Learning and Teaching Development Service as the main pedagogic lead for ePortfolio. I’m also involved with OLAF (online assessment and feedback) and have a keen interest in other e-Learning initiatives such as Open Badges and Learning Analytics. I will still be continuing with my main duties, but in addition I am now the new FMS faculty liaison for LTDS.

The liaison role is similar to the library liaison role and I will:

  • Be a point of contact for quality enhancement and technology enhanced learning information, resources, queries and questions
  • Help coordinate support requests for consultancy projects and other activity
  • Identify opportunities to make links to existing technology enhanced learning activities
  • Attend FLTSEC meetings, and appropriate SLTSEC meetings / away days
  • Disseminate timely technology enhanced learning information to the Faculty and Schools
  • Develop an understanding of the disciplinary perspectives and challenges to enable targeted information to be provided, and to feed into LTDS planning.

My email address is graeme.redshaw-boxwell@newcastle.ac.uk and I’m available on ext 83903. You can also find me on twitter – @graemeboxwell.

Graeme Redshaw-Boxwell, Learning and Teaching Development Service

Director Update: Winter 2015

steve (2)The FMS Education, Research, Development and Practice Unit has now been in existence for over a year and we continue to run a full programme of events. Attendance at our Journal Club continues to be strong and so far this year we have had stimulating presentations from Jo Matthan and Lindsay Ferrie. These meetings provide us with opportunities to look at papers on a wide range of teaching issues and discussions are always lively and thoughtful. If you have not been able so far to attend then please do come or if you want to present a paper on a learning and teaching topic that you have found interesting then your contribution will be warmly welcomed. Our learning and teaching seminar programme this semester has included talks from Concha Martinez from the Dental School in Madrid talking about dental education in Spain, Stephen Billett from Queensland talking about workplace learning and Hamish McLeod from Edinburgh talking about e-learning. The seminar programme continues in the New Year and the programme will be found elsewhere in this newsletter. Can I remind you that we are always seeking seminar speakers so if there is somebody that you would like to invite or if you wish to give a seminar yourself then, again, we would be pleased to hear from you. Finally, our first Faculty learning and teaching forum was held in December when we heard about a wide range of work-in-progress projects from across the Faculty reflecting our diverse interests in learning and teaching. This range of interests was also very much to be seen in the applications made to our small projects fund and I congratulate the successful applicants and wish them well in their projects. Finally, the next cycle of EQUATE is well under way with strong representation from FMS staff.

There are important outputs from this range of activity. The first, of course, is the enhancements of the teaching we deliver to our students while at the same time engaging in development of our own practice. It is also important, however, that we take opportunities to disseminate the results of our work. This includes, of course, our colleagues in the Faculty and University but we also need to disseminate the results more widely both to our specialised educational communities and where appropriate, to a more general education audience. This will include presentations at educational conferences whether of your relevant professional bodies or communities or more wide-ranging educational meetings but it also should include, where appropriate, publication in refereed journals. The FMS Unit will be running a series of events to help and encourage you to take the plunge and write up your work for submission to a relevant Journal. The seminar by David Reed on January 19th is going to focus on dissemination through publication. David is a Professorial Teaching Fellow in Southampton University and will be talking about his transition from being a basic scientist to developing educational projects and publishing the results. The Centre for Learning and Teaching (CfLAT) in Education, Communication and Language Sciences runs a very successful paper writing group. Members of the Centre are able to take papers in preparation to the group for supportive discussion and comment. They have offered us two slots in the New Year for us to take any papers we have in preparation to the group for discussion. Dates will be announced in the New Year but if anybody has a paper that they would like to take to this group please let me know now. I see this very much as a prelude to starting up our own paper writing group in FMS. EQUATE has a specific focus on writing up outputs from the projects of this group and has organised a writing retreat which will help us to build our collective skills in writing for education publications. Finally, in the New Year I will be placing on the Unit site a list of education journals that you might want to consider when thinking about publication or simply as a resource for reading.

I would also like draw your attention to the BERA Conference being held in September. The British Educational Research Association annual meeting is one of the top education conferences along with ECER, the conference of the European Educational Research Association. There is a Higher Education SIG within BERA and so given that and the fact that the meeting is in Leeds this year and so readily accessible could I encourage as many of you as possible to attend and, where appropriate present. Details of the BERA conference are to be found elsewhere in this newsletter.

In the meantime I would like to thank everybody whose has contributed to the work of the Unit this year whether as a presenter at one of our events, helping with organisation or simply through attending and contributing as a participant. I wish you all a restful and peaceful break over the Christmas holiday.

Prof Steve McHanwell, Director, FMS Unit for ERDP

Two articles in the Journal of Anatomy

Smith CF, Finn GM, Stewart J and McHanwell S. (2016).  Anatomical Society core regional anatomy syllabus for undergraduate medicine: the Delphi process. Journal of Anatomy 228, 2-14.  doi:  10.1111/joa. 12402

Smith CF, Finn GM, Stewart J, Atkinson MA, Davies DC, Dyball R, Morris J, Ockleford C, Parkin I, Standring S, Whiten S, Wilton J and McHanwell S. (2016). The Anatomical Society core regional anatomy syllabus for undergraduate medicine. Journal of Anatomy 228, 15-23.  doi:  10.1111/joa. 12405.

These two articles describe the results of a multi-centre project the aim of which was to undertake a revision of the Anatomical Society syllabus for the teaching of gross anatomy in undergraduate medicine.

In 2007 the Education Committee of Anatomical Society (McHanwell et al, European Journal of Anatomy, 11, 3-18) published a core syllabus in anatomy for undergraduate medicine.  This syllabus was subsequently included as a reference document in Tomorrow’s Doctors 2009.  After 10 years it was felt that this syllabus would benefit from a robust analysis and review using a more rigorous research process.  The method employed was a Delphi process using an expert panel of 51 participants.  The results of that study are published as two papers, the first describing the methodology and results and the second detailing the revised syllabus.

It is hoped that this revised syllabus will be helpful as a tool to develop a coherent approach to gross anatomy teaching that will support student learning.

 

Iain Keenan elected to the Anatomical Society Council

Iain Keenan - Medical EducationDr Iain Keenan has just been elected onto the Anatomical Society Council for a term of 3 years. The results of a ballot of Society members were announced on Tuesday 15th December 2015 at the Society AGM that was held during the Anatomical Society Winter Meeting held at Cambridge University. He will take on his new role in addition to his current responsibilities as Anatomical Society Social Media Editor and as member of the Society Membership and Website Management committees. His work for the Society so far has included setting up, developing, editing and managing the Anatomical Society Twitter, Facebook and Instagram accounts, YouTube channel and LinkedIn group, assisting in the decision when recruiting a new website and membership service provider for the Society, judging the Society Best Image Prize and helping with organisation and reviewing of abstracts when the Society Winter Meeting was held here in the Medical School in 2013.

L&T seminar: Observational drawing and the study of anatomy in education

When: 7th January 2016, 12:30 to 1:30

Where: Ridley 2, Room 1.57

Leonard Shapiro, Cape Town

Leonard is a drawing teacher currently based in Cape Town. He holds a Bachelor of Fine Art (BAFA Honours) degree from the University of Cape Town’s (UCT) Michaelis School of Fine Art and a Bachelor of Social Science (BsocSc) degree from UCT, with majors in psychology and sociology.

Leonard currently runs drawing workshops for both academics and anatomy students at medical schools, in order to improve their observation and memorisation skills.  In 2014, he ran a 4 day drawing workshop for senior staff members from UCT Faculty of Health Sciences department of Human Biology, including specialists in cell biology, anatomy and neurology.  In 2015, he taught a group of anatomy students at the UCT medical school to draw. Leonard is also currently co-authoring a paper with Professor Steve Reid at the University of Cape Town on drawing, observation and memorisation as an aid to the learning of anatomy.

Leonard teaches students in the technique of observational (or ‘structural’) drawing, where the objective is the translation of a 3-dimensional form onto a 2-dimensional surface and involves multi-sensory observation and simultaneous drawing.  This method significantly increases the student’s perceptual understanding of the 3-dimensional form of the object and, in the process, the cognitive memorisation of the form of the object occurs.  After studying an object through drawing in this way, at a certain point the drawer-observer is able to retrieve this information directly from their memory without looking at the object.  The form of the object has been accurately observed in its entirety, and consequently memorised.

His website has images and video of anatomy students’ drawings: http://www.lateralleap.co.za/drawing/drawing-workshop-gallery/

 

MBBS Curriculum Review: Building on Success

steve jonesThe MBBS course has been hugely successful for many years and is constantly reviewed and adjusted. However it is now some years (over 15!) since there was a major review of the whole structure and content of the programme. In that time much has changed, for example when the current curriculum was designed all of our graduates undertook two 6 month House Officer posts in Medicine and Surgery and the course was designed to give them “terminal velocity” to begin their careers. Now our graduates undertake a 2 year foundation programme and their first post might be in psychiatry or paediatrics. Of course we now also have a medical school in Malaysia which follows the same outcomes. Graduates there also undertake a two year period of House Officer Training with a similarly wide range of postings. Other external drivers to change include new national assessments in the final year such as the Prescribing safety Assessment and Situational Judgement Test and more are planned in particular the UK National Licencing Assessment.

The most important driver to change however comes from within. The Board of Medical Studies has recognised for a number a years that there are issues relating to the structure of the programme that cannot be addressed without a major review. We wanted to wait until NUMed was firmly established before embarking on major changes and of course want and need input from Malaysia to make sure the course is appropriate there and in the UK.

The specific issues we wish to address in reviewing the curriculum are:

  • Improving integration between the Phases of the MBBS course and between the institutions that deliver it (Newcastle, Durham and NUMed).
  • To address the loss of momentum in relation to clinical skills that builds in Stage 3 but can drop off in Stage 4.
  • To change the timing of finals and facilitate “assistantship” that is not overshadowed by high stakes summative assessments.

A curriculum review group has been established including representation from Durham University, NUMed and the 4 base-units, students and junior doctors as well as Health Education North East and lay representation. To date we have agreed, and The Board of Medical Studies has approved,some important principles that include:

  • Retaining and strengthening our case based approach to teaching.
  • No longer using the term  “Phases” but having a single integrated programme.
  • Firmly embedding assessment in our plans for change and specifically
    • Completing written finals in year 4.
    • Moving clinical finals to earlier in Year 5.
    • Building in the potential for resitting within year.
  • Changing the structure of Semester two in Year4 to include core clinical rotations.
  • Strengthening and broadening assistantship in year 5.
  • Increasing time spent in primary care.

The next phase is to review in detail the outcomes of the programme  before implementation begins in 2017.

Dr Steve Jones, School of Medical Education

L&T seminar: Developing an undergraduate syllabus: how much do medical students need to know and what should that be?

When: 17th March 2016, 12:30 to 1:30

Where: Ridley 1, 2.04A

Hannah Jacob, University College London

This seminar will outline the experience of developing an undergraduate syllabus for child health.  It will explore techniques for engaging key stakeholders from medical students to professors, parents to the Medical Schools Council.  We will discuss how the syllabus was developed, beginning with interviews and focus groups and culminating in a modified Delphi process.  The concept of necessary knowledge bases for medical students will be discussed as well as the role of skills and attitudes competencies.