One of the first things we noticed about the National Library of Finland was how many people were using the microform readers – 7 folks busily working away. The Library building is beautiful, though very traditional, and I hope to add some of Ruth’s photos to the blog soon.
I liked the way they display their journals (see left) and also that patrons should have “clean, dry hands”
After our second conference talk I enjoyed chatting to a couple of smaller groups of Finnish librarians. In the large conference they had been unwilling to ask many questions, but that wasn’t the case in the smaller groups! We talked about how to engage researchers in developing their IL and I mentioned the self assessment tool I use at Newcastle. This just encourages folks to reflect on their own abilities and to identify areas they want to develop. A cut down version of it is going to be published soon as a Vitae booklet called the Informed Researcher.
Cafe in Finland provides blankets for customers brave enough to sit outside in November!
Our second talk in Helsinki was a very practical one about the process we went through to create the new 7Ps model and research lens. This was the first time Ruth and I have tried to describe the whole process and I think we both enjoyed the experience. We talked about the original model and how well it has been adopted around the world, using our own institutions as examples.
After more discussion about the strengths and weaknesses of the model, we went on to describe the (often painful!) process of creating the new version. There was a lot of interest in the Information Literacy Landscape (see link above) as well as positive reaction to the concept of moving away from skills to encompass attitudes and behaviours.
We used the “one thing” technique I’ve used before to gather feedback from the group and I’ll summarise that on the blog once we’ve had time to analyse it.
Our first talk to the Finnish information literacy librarians network was entitled “Information Literacy models: learning from the past to inform the future”. Our aim was to give a brief overview of some existing models as well as dipping into some teaching and learning theory to stimulate discussion on the use of models in IL. We looked at some of the issues and criticisms of models as well as discussing how they can help in IL. Ruth and I both believe models can be helpful and were keen to explain how we have built on existing theories and pedagogy in developing the revised SCONUL Seven Pillars model. You can find our slides here.
Ruth Stubbings and I are in Finland at the invitation of the Finnish IL network to talk about how we went about revising the SCONUL IL model. The Finns have their own model, called a recommendation which they want to revise. At present it is focused on undergraduates and they’d like to extend it to include researchers. From discussions we’ve had, it seems that facilitating research is just starting to become a big agenda item here ( so I’ve recommended they all buy my book on Developing library services for research!) There are around 120 librarians at the 2 day conference, which is held every year, and the plan is to get together in groups representing the different kinds of academic library and actually start to redesign their model.
(Pictures to follow)
Well, I’ve just arrived in Helsinki with Ruth Stubbings. We are going to meet lots of Finnish librarians on Monday and Tuesday; they have asked us to talk about how we devised the new seven pillars model and chat about the role of models in general. We are both sitting here in our room in the university guest house, typing away on our notebooks, how sad are we?
Hopefully we will manage some sightseeing tomorrow, the city looks spectacular ( from what I’ve seen in the dark) and we may even peek into a library or two along the way…
PS Here’s Roo on the ferry to Suomenlinna sea fortress
It’s good to see the RIN report on the role of supervisors in developing information literacy has now been published.
We’ve been having fun at Newcastle over the last few months, creating a series of subject guides on our web pages. We’ve subscribed to the LibGuides software from Springshare (and I have to say they were very good about allowing us a lengthy trial period and being patient while we sorted out the paperwork). It’s not very expensive and enables the creation of a pretty flexible set of web pages, very quickly. We’re still developing them and have yet to discuss how consistent we want them to be, but we are delighted with their impact so far. They’re an excellent way of drawing together a few key resources at subject level. Mine are still fairly basic (here’s my Agriculture Guide), but my colleague Lucy is adding a lot of interesting content (here’s her Arts Guide)
“Prior research has highlighted the isolation felt by some researchers engaged in academic writing. This article aims to examine whether such isolation might be partially overcome by membership of an online community of writers (CoW), hosted by higher education library services. A review of the literature was followed by action research based around the authors’ own long distance collaborative writing task in order to explore the issues at first-hand. Case studies of existing online writing communities known to the authors but not currently hosted by libraries were also undertaken. Themes emerging include the importance of finding a medium for a CoW that is familiar and comfortable. Motivators to join a CoW include demands that academics be research active. Demotivators may include lack of trust and reluctance to share.” (Emerald/Library Hi Tech abstract)
Can we ever have too much information literacy related teaching? A few years ago I’d have found this difficult to believe, but now I’m feeling more than a little overwhelmed by the hours which I could devote to it. I haven’t managed to write my blog for quite a while because I have been teaching around 25 hours a week for the last few weeks. then there’s preparation…
I try to work with academic staff to integrate IL into the curriculum, so I know my workload would be even higher if they weren’t doing some too. What’s the solution? I’m giving more “lectures” to large groups of 100+ backed up with optional workshops, less than ideal. We’re also making more of the skills element avaialble as online tutorials, but I feel uneasy about doing this without some subjective context around it.
I wonder if the increase in demand is because at last there’s a wider understanding of the importance of IL or just that we simply have more students. Is this happening elsewhere too? I’d be interested to hear
