Transdermal delivery and formulation design of opioids: Where are we now and where are we heading?

Graphical Abstract

We have a new review article published in the Journal of Controlled Release: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2026.114894


Liang YM, Azizi J, Ng KW, Goh CF. Transdermal delivery and formulation design of opioids: Where are we now and where are we heading? J Control Release. 2026;394:114894. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2026.114894


This has been another excellent transnational collaboration with Dr Choon Fu Goh and colleagues. In this paper, we take a deep dive into a seemingly simple question with a deceptively complex answer: why is it so difficult to deliver opioid drugs across the skin?

Transdermal delivery offers clear advantages for opioid therapy, including more stable drug levels and improved patient convenience compared to oral or injectable routes. However, only a small number of opioids, such as fentanyl and buprenorphine, have been successfully developed into marketable patches. The main limitation is the skin itself. As a barrier, it is highly effective, and drugs require a very specific balance of properties, including molecular size, lipophilicity, and potency, to cross it. Many widely used opioids, including morphine, fall outside this narrow window.

In the review, we examine the main strategies that have been explored to address this challenge, including chemical permeation enhancers, formulation approaches, and physical methods. A consistent theme is that success in controlled laboratory settings does not always translate into clinical use. Improving permeation alone is not sufficient if the system cannot deliver clinically relevant doses reliably in practice. It increasingly appears that formulation strategies relying on passive diffusion across intact skin are unlikely to succeed. Looking ahead, active skin penetration strategies are likely to lead progress by enabling more consistent drug delivery while reducing dosing burden.

I thank my co-authors for their contributions to this work, and I hope the review will serve as a useful resource for the research community.

Review: Microneedle-based devices for point-of-care infectious disease diagnostics

We have published a review article on microneedles as a technological platform for diagnosing infectious diseases. In this review, we enumerate the infectious diseases that could potentially be diagnosed in the skin, examine the mechanisms of existing microneedle diagnostic technologies, and evaluate their applications in infectious disease diagnosis. This publication is timely given that we’re in the middle of a infectious disease pandemic.

Figure 1: Microneedles inserted into the skin may extract or detect disease markers in situ. Diagnostic tests for infectious diseases should ideally be both specific and rapid.

Any diagnostic test has to be specific to be useful (Figure 1). For a potentially deadly diseases, the more rapid the diagnosis, the better, because it buys precious time for the patient to seek early treatment, which could save lives. However, for infectious diseases that can be transmitted by close contact, it’s also desirable that the patient can administer the test themselves without too much discomfort. Many tests do better in meeting some of these criteria at the expense of other criteria. For example, I took the PCR test for COVID-19. I am sure the test itself was highly specific, but the nasal and throat swabs were uncomfortable. The diagnosis wasn’t exactly ‘rapid’ either — I got my result several days later (mainly due to limited test capacity at that time, but that has improved significantly since). Microneedle devices are painless to administer on the skin, and tests can produce real-time or near-real-time results. Not all of these studies have been on infectious diseases, of course. The technology is still nascent but the potentials are huge.

The review article is currently in press, but a pre-proof is already available for download from Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B. There have been a number of minor corrections to this pre-proof (mainly typographical and referencing error) which will appear in the final publication, but the pre-proof should satisfy the impatient for now.

Congratulations to everyone involved in putting this publication together.

Review: Silica nanoparticles in transmucosal drug delivery

Graphical abstract

Our latest review in drug delivery is about silica nanoparticles, published this week in the open access journal, Pharmaceutics.

This is a collaborative paper with Professor Vitaliy Khutoryanskiy (University of Reading, UK), Dr Twana M. Ways (University of Sulaimani, Iraq), and our own Dr Wing Man Lau (Newcastle University, UK). In the paper, we examine the applications of silica nanoparticles in transmucosal drug delivery. We discuss different types of silica nanoparticles and their methods of preparation, including surface functionalisation strategies to facilitate interactions with mucosal surfaces.

The paper is published under the very permissive Creative Commons Attribution Licence (CC BY 4.0), which allows you to freely share and adapt the work as long as the source is appropriately cited. Please cite this work as:

M. Ways TM, Ng KW, Lau WM, Khutoryanskiy VV (2020) Silica nanoparticles in transmucosal drug delivery. Pharmaceutics 12(8):751. doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics12080751