History and characteristics of Bishop Auckland… – October 2012

Illustration of Bridge over Tees
Bridge over Tees. Gainford, * 1860, from Market House, Bishop Auckland, 1860 by J.B. Bond, from History and characteristics of Bishop Auckland…2 vols. Bishop Aukland WJ Cummins,1872 (Rare Books, RB Quarto 942.81 RIC)

In our June 2011 Treasure we featured illustrations added by William Bowness Bond to “Vestiges of old Newcastle and Gateshead”.

For this month’s Treasure we highlight illustrations he added to another book in his collection: Richley, Matthew – History and characteristics of Bishop Auckland…

As he says in the hand written note on the flyleaf of volume 1:

I have extra illustrated this History of Bishop Auckland, in which town I was born, by inserting 270 engravings, water colour drawings and autographs.”
WB Bond, Venice September 1913.Mr. Bond had added numerous items to the volume. There is a type-written list of the items at the end of volume 2.

The book in its original form was a single volume comprising 190 pages. With the additions it consists of 2 substantial volumes half bound in green goatskin with green cloth sides.

William Bowness Bond died in Venice in April 1932. He had bequeathed his book collection to Armstrong College, one of the Colleges that would later form Newcastle University. Most of the collection reached the library in January 1933, but, according to the Library Committee minutes of the period one box of material was delayed in Customs. The collection consisted of approximately 360 volumes and some miscellaneous material.

We have been unable to find any further information about Mr. Bond, or why he bequeathed the books to the College.

Illustration of Market House, Bishop Auckland
Market House, Bishop Auckland, 1860 by J.B. Bond, from History and characteristics of Bishop Auckland…2 vols. Bishop Aukland WJ Cummins,1872 (Rare Books, RB Quarto 942.81 RIC)

* “Bridge over Tees. Gainford. 1860.” is Gainford Railway Bridge completed in 1856 allowing the Darlington to Barnard Castle branch of the North Eastern Railway to cross the Tees. The branch line was closed in November 1964.

Captain Marryat – September 2012

Illustration of Captain Frederick Marryat
Illustration of Captain Frederick Marryat, from The phantom ship (Butler (Joan) Collection, Butler 823.7 MAR)

Captain Frederick Marryat was born in Westminster, London on 10th July 1792 to a very wealthy family. At a young age he became fascinated by maritime life, and tried many times to run away to sea. After turning just 14, he began his career upon the frigate Impérieuse as a midshipman, and would continue to work at sea until 1830. Marryat proved himself to be an outstanding sailor, and over the course of his naval career he jumped overboard five times to rescue fellow seamen, devised his own system of flag signals which is still in use today and invented a life boat which gained him the Gold Medal of the Royal Humane Society.

However, it was only after resigning from the Navy that he published his first book “The Naval Officer, or Scenes and Adventures in the Life of Frank Mildmay“, which made a great deal of money and launched his literary career. Captain Marryat published twenty five titles in his lifetime, and a further two novels were completed and released posthumously. Captain Marryat’s books utilised his twenty five years’ worth of first-hand experience aboard ships to create some of the first sea novels, which were much admired by literary greats such as Mark Twain, Joseph Conrad and Ernest Hemingway. Marryat’s later books were predominantly children’s books, including “The Children of the New Forest” which was made into a BBC movie in 1998, and there are 16 of these in the Butler (Joan) Collection.

‘”Amine,” cried he at last, “the Phantom Ship!-my father!”
The seamen of the Utrecht, more astonished by the marvellous result than by their former danger, threw themselves down upon the deck: some hastened below, some prayed, others were dumb with astonishment and fear. Asmine appeared more calm than any, not excepting Philip: she surveyed the vessel as it slowly forced its way through; she beheld the seamen on board of her coolly leaning over her gunwale, as if deriding the destruction they had occasioned; she looked for Vanderdecken himself, and on the poop of the vessel, with his trumpet under his arm, she beheld the image of her Philip – the same hardy, strong build – the same features – about the same age apparently – there could be no doubt it was the doomed Vanderdecken.’

Olympic Games – August 2012

Title page from 'Odes of  Pindar'
Title page from Odes of Pindar: with several other pieces in prose and verse, translated from the Greek by Gilbert West, London, 1753 (Bainbrigg Library/Appleby Grammar School Collection, Bai 1753 PIN)

The ancient Greek Olympic Games can be traced back to 776 BC although their exact origins are obfuscated by myth and legend. Dedicated to the Greek gods, they were staged in Olympia, in north-western Greece. Olympia was a place of worship and politics and home to temples, shrines and a great statue of Zeus. The statue was one of the seven wonders of the Ancient World, but it is thought to have been either destroyed or moved and then broken-up, by the Romans.

The Games were usually held every four years, or Olympiad, and all free men who could speak Greek were eligible to compete in the small number of events. Athletes usually competed nude; the Olympics was a festival celebrating the achievements of the human body. An ‘Olympic Truce’ ensured that athletes could travel from their countries to the Games in safety. Victorious athletes were honoured with wreaths of laurel leaves, hymns and feasts and their achievements recorded. The ancient Games continued for twelve centuries, until 394 AD, when they were suppressed for being pagan by Emperor Theodosius I, as part of his campaign to impose Christianity as a state religion.

This title page is taken from Odes of Pindar, written by the Theban poet in the 5th century BC. Pindar was one of the most renowned poets of his time and the Odes are the only pieces of his work that survive intact today. He composed the words and music of over forty odes that were performed in celebration of the winners of different events at the Olympics and other ancient Games. Pindar’s Odes are beautiful but complex, difficult to translate from ancient Greek, and often hard for 21st century readers to understand and appreciate.

Pindar compared the achievements of Olympic victors to those of the great Greek Gods – believing their superhuman sporting deeds to be almost divine. Pindar’s poems do not describe in any detail what actually happened at the Games; his poems are about victory and the acclaim associated with winning. Athletes who had been victorious at the Games often commissioned an ode from a poet, for a considerable sum of money. The clients were rich aristocrats who saw the songs as ways of announcing their victories to the whole Greek world and ensuring their achievements would be long-remembered. Unsurprisingly, rumours of rich families ‘buying’ victories at the Olympics were rife.

In the first Olympick Ode, which was dedicated to Hiero of Syracuse, who in the 73rd Olympiad was victorious in the Race of Single Horses, Pindar writes:

     ‘Then for happy Hiero weave
     Garlands of Aeolian Strains;
     Him these Honours to receive
     The Olympick Law ordains.

     No more worthy of her Lay
     Can the Muse a Mortal find;
     Greater in Imperial Sway,
     Richer in a virtuous Mind;
     Heav’n O King, with tender care
     Waits thy Wishes to fulfil.
     Then e’er long will I prepare,
     Plac’d on Chronium’s sunny Hill,
     Thee in sweeter Verse to praise,
     Following thy victorious Steeds;
     Is to prosper all thy Ways
     Still thy Guardian God proceeds.’

For the 2012 London Olympics, Dr. Armand D’Angour, a lecturer in Classics at Oxford University, has been invited to compose an ode by the Lord Mayor of London, Boris Johnson. An expert in the composition of ancient Greek verse, D’Angour also wrote an ode that was read during the closing ceremony of the 2004 Athens Olympics.

This is the third time that the modern Olympic Games have been held in London – the 4th games were held in 1908 and the 14th in 1948. The games had been cancelled in 1944 due to the Second World War. When they were finally held in 1948, they became known as the Austerity Games due to continued rationing and tight post-war budgets, in contrast to this year’s £2billion extravaganza.

Although the modern Games were inspired in part by the ancient Games, they also have their roots in the Wenlock Games, which are held annually in Much Wenlock, Shropshire. Dr William Penny Brookes established the Wenlock Agricultural Reading Society in 1841 to provide an opportunity for local, working class people to acquire knowledge. He then created an Olympian Class in 1850 to encourage people to keep fit by training and competing in sporting competitions at the annual Wenlock Olympian Games. After meeting Pierre de Coubertin, a French educationalist who shared his belief that physical exercise could help prevent illness, he invited him to stay in Wenlock. Inspired by the Wenlock Games, Coubertin went on to set-up the International Olympic Committee in 1894, which organised the first modern Olympic Games in Athens in 1896. They have taken part almost every four years since.

The Bastille – July 2012

Image of the Bastille in Paris
Image of the Bastille, Paris from Bretez, L. Plan de Paris commencâe l’annâee 1734… [Paris?: s.n., 1739]
(Rare Books, RB 912.4436 BRE Elephant folio)

On 14th July 1789 the Bastille in Paris was stormed. It was a fourteenth-century fortress that had been used as a state prison from the early Fifteenth Century but would come to symbolise both despotism and the French Republican Movement.

When finance minister, Jacques Necker, was dismissed Parisians became fearful of a conservative coup. Amid widespread violence and calls for a written constitution, royal forces had withdrawn from central Paris. Revolutionaries had armed themselves on 13th July and wanted to loot the Bastille for its significant gunpowder supply. Attention had also been focussed on the Bastille by one of its infamous inmates, the Marquis de Sade, who stoked up political fervour by shouting from his cell. The commander of the Bastille, Bernard-René de Launay, tried to negotiate but an impatient crowd stormed the outer courtyard and firing broke out. By mid-afternoon mutinous royal forces had bolstered the revolutionary crowd, bringing trained infantrymen and cannons. When the drawbridge came down, de Launay was powerless. The crowd surged in and dragged de Launay to his death. The Bastille was quickly portrayed in the pro-revolutionary press as a place of despotism and terror, thus legitimising the revolutionary action that day. (Historians such as Simon Schama assert that the storming of the Bastille was the liberation of its seven inmates from a relatively comfortable imprisonment and that the prison was governed well.)

The storming of the Bastille would be the inspiration for plays and broadsides for months to come. It is widely held to have marked the beginning of the French Revolution and the end of the absolute monarchy or ancien régime (Louis XVI recognised the authority of the National Assembly on 15th July). The Marquis de la Fayette was appointed Commander in Chief of the National Guard and ordered the demolition of the Bastille – a project that was managed by Pierre-François Palloy who sold parts of the building as souvenirs.

The Bastille is shown clearly on this eighteenth-century map as a tall fortress with eight towers, adjacent to the Porte St. Antoine gateway in the eastern part of the city. Michel-Étienne Turgot commissioned a map of Paris from the sculptor, painter and specialist in perspective views, Louis Bretez in 1734. This now famous map took two years to complete and, because Bretez was permitted access to mansions and gardens in the course of his surveying and drawing, is both accurate and detailed. It comprises 20 sectional birds-eye views of Paris and its suburbs that are presented as double facing sheets. As a commodity, it was aimed at the elite: the King; members of the Royal Academy of Sciences; and wealthy foreigners. For researchers today, it is a valuable primary document, providing not only a map of Paris as it was about 55 years before the French Revolution but also drawings of buildings that have not survived.

Diamond Jubilee – Diamond Jubilee 2012

Page from An account of the rejoicings, illuminations, &c. &c. that have taken place in Newcastle and Gateshead on the following occasions: the peace of Amiens, in 1801, the jubilee of His Majesty George III, 1809, the general peace, in 1814, the abandonment of the bill against Queen Caroline, 1820, coronation of George III, and Queen Charlotte, 1761, coronation of His Majesty George IV, 1821 by J. Sykes, 1821 (Clarke (Edwin) local Collection, Clarke 1502)

To celebrate Queen Elizabeth II’s Diamond Jubilee, we bring you a special Treasure of the Month.

2012 sees the 60th year of the reign of Queen Elizabeth II. It is astounding to think that no-one under the age of 60 has ever known any other monarch. It is unlikely that future generations will see a monarch of Britain on the throne for so long; however the Queen is not the first long-reigning monarch. Many of our former Kings and Queens have ruled for many decades, having ascended to the throne at a young age.

Elizabeth I was twenty-five when she became queen in 1558 and ruled for almost 45 years until her death in 1603. Edward III ruled for just over 50 years from the age of thirteen in 1327 to his death in 1377. Henry III ruled England for just over 56 years from 1216 to 1272. James VI of Scotland (who later became James I of England after the union of the English and Scottish crowns upon Queen Elizabeth I’s death in 1603) ruled Scotland for nearly 58 years from 1567 to 1625. However, both Henry and James came to the throne as infants, which rather increased their chances of having a long reign!

George III set a new record for the longest-serving monarch when he died in 1820, having ruled for almost 60 years. However, his son the Prince of Wales (later George IV) ruled as Regent from 1811 after George III’s descent into ‘madness’ reportedly brought on by the death of his youngest daughter and then as King from 1820 to 1830. Finally, the only monarch to have reigned longer than our current queen is Queen Victoria. Aged just 18 upon her ascension to the throne in 1837, she celebrated a Golden and Diamond jubilee before her death aged 81 in 1901, after 63 years and 216 days as queen.

Jubilees have, unsurprisingly, always been celebrated with much pomp and ceremony. Celebrations have taken place all over the country, memorabilia has been mass-produced and purchased by millions, and street parties have been held. George III’s golden jubilee was celebrated in 1809, as he entered his 50th year as King. Below is an extract from an account of the celebrations that took place in Newcastle. It states:

“The day was ushered in with ringing of bells; the flag was hoisted on the castle, on some of the churches, and by the ships in the river”.

The rest of the day was made-up of several acts of charity including meals of beef and plum pudding for the poor, the liberation of prisoners and a collection for the foundation of a public school. There were also church services throughout the day.

Not exactly the barbeque and pop concert from Buckingham Palace that we’ll be enjoying this year, but jubilant all the same!

Queen Victoria’s Golden and Diamond jubilees involved public processions, banquets and thanksgiving services. Below is a memento from her Golden jubilee entitled Our Gracious Queen by Mrs O. F. Walton. It is a collection of images and stories of Queen Victoria’s life from 1887. There were great outpourings of affection for Victoria, who was hugely popular again in the late nineteenth century. Mrs Walton reminds us all to:

‘…thank God that He has spared her to us so long, and let us pray that He may spare her for many years to come…God grant, then, that each of us may be a true loyal subject of our dear Queen, always eager to stand up for her, always willing to obey her…’

Times and traditions may have changed over the years, but in 2012 with the monarchy undergoing a new surge in popularity, this jubilee is sure to bring as much celebration as those of George and Victoria did.

Oh and just in case you are wondering, Queen Elizabeth II will have to rule until 10th September 2015 to beat Queen Victoria’s record and become our longest-reigning monarch!

Front cover from Our Gracious Queen showing Queen Elizabeth II
Front cover from Our Gracious Queen by Mrs. O. F. Walton., 1887 (19th century collection, 942.081 WAL)

Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens – June 2012

Illustration Peter and Wendy behind a tree with fairies underneith
Fairies are all more or less in hiding until dusk” from Barrie, J.M. Peter Pan In Kensington Gardens. With drawings by Arthur Rackham
(London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1906) (Burnett (Mark) Collection, Burnett 187)

75 years ago, on 19th June 1937, J.M. Barrie died. The Scottish novelist and playwright is best-known as the creator of Peter Pan, a mischievous boy who never ages, that made his debut in The Little White Bird (1902). Peter Pan, or The Boy Who Wouldn’t Grow Up (1904) saw the character take centre stage in a play that was later adapted into the novel Peter and Wendy (1911). The success of the stage play persuaded publishers Hodder and Stoughton to republish chapters 13 to 18 of The Little White Bird as Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens (1906), a copy of which is held in the Burnett collection of Children’s Literature.

In Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens, Peter (who had begun life part bird, part human) escapes through the window of his London home and flies to Kensington Gardens. His belief that he can fly is shattered when a crow informs him that he is no longer part bird but rather human. Thus stranded, he takes up residence in the gardens. The fairies that already live there are scared of him at first but Peter endears himself to them as their entertainer, playing panpipes at their dances and generally amusing them. It is with the help of Queen Mab and her fairies that he eventually manages to fly home to his mother. His decision to return to Kensington Gardens to bid his farewells proves to be a mistake: in his absence, his mother gives birth to another boy and, having used a second wish to return home, Peter again returns to the gardens, heartbroken and feeling usurped in his mother’s affections. When a girl called Maimie Mannering becomes lost in the gardens, Peter makes a lifelong friend. Although Maimie goes home she never forgets Peter. However, whilst Maimie grows up; Peter spends his time playing and burying the children who become lost at night, giving each a headstone in the gardens.

Arthur Rackham (1867-1939) provided the illustrations for this book and his colour plates added to its popularity. He would go on to illustrate many children’s books, such as Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland (1907) and The Wind in the Willows (1940) and to become one of the most prolific English illustrators of the Edwardian period. His illustrations are characterised by pen and brush-drawn main features and a soft palette of transparent watercolour washes in blues, reds and greens applied over a yellow tone. His illustrations for Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens are typical Rackham: fairies with realistic human traits depicted in naturalistic settings.

Peter Pan in Kensington Gardens and Peter and Wendy were the last novels Barrie would write as, by the 1890s, he had become captivated by theatre. He turned his back on a successful career as a novelist to embark on a career as a dramatist, with mixed fortune.

Since his death, Barrie’s work has, perhaps inevitably, been open to Freudian criticism: he was infatuated by independent, distant women and divorce proceedings had made his failure to consummate his marriage public and, in Peter Pan particularly, you have a character that is unable to engage with adulthood. Yet his reputation has survived psychological and literary scrutiny since Peter Pan remains firmly fixed in popular culture.

Illustration of a fairy hiding behind a flower
When he heard Peter’s voice he popped in alarm behind a tulip” from Barrie, J.M. Peter Pan In Kensington Gardens. With drawings by Arthur Rackham
(London: Hodder & Stoughton, 1906) (Burnett (Mark) Collection, Burnett 187)

Felling Pit Disaster 1812 – May 2012

A “billhead” (Ephemera Collection)

This Treasure of the month was provided by Owen Brittan one of this year’s Robinson Bequest Students.

This May marks the 200th anniversary of the accident of the Felling Colliery which claimed the lives of 92 workers when an explosion ripped through the two pits. It was one of the worst ever known disasters in the history of coal fields with a survival rate of only 24 percent of the workforce who were an average age of 22.

Page showing a table with the Name, day of birth, how old and employment
Page showing the list of person killed by the Felliery Colliery explosion, from The funeral sermon of the Felling Colliery sufferers : to which are prefixed, a description and plan of that colliery : an account of the late accident there : of the fund raised for the widows and suggestions for founding a collier’s hospital, by Hodgson, John.
Newcastle [England] : Walker, 1813. (Clarke (Edwing) Local, Clarke 1833)

The tragedy took place years before any sort of regulation on child labour as evidenced by the large amount of children who died in the explosion. Of the 92 left dead, 11 of them were 10 years of age or younger. The story of the accident comes to us through the publication of Reverend John Hodgson’s funeral sermon on behalf of the fallen miners.

In October of 1810 Messrs. John and William Brandling, Henderson, and Grace each acquired a fourth share of the Felling colliery located in the parish of Jarrow, about a mile and a half east of Gateshead. The colliery consisted of two shafts, the John Pit and William Pit, which were both over 200 yards deep. Two shifts of men were constantly employed, except on Sundays. From its opening in October 1810 to 25 May 1812, the date of the explosion, the mine had had only one accident, which resulted in slight burns to two or three workmen, while excavating over 25 acres of coal.

Page showing a table with the Name, day of birth, how old and employment
Page showing the list of person killed by the Felliery Colliery explosion, from The funeral sermon of the Felling Colliery sufferers : to which are prefixed, a description and plan of that colliery : an account of the late accident there : of the fund raised for the widows and suggestions for founding a collier’s hospital, by Hodgson, John.
Newcastle [England] : Walker, 1813. (Clarke (Edwing) Local, Clarke 1833)

It was not until July 8, after diverting a current of water into the pits for over a month to make the air breathable, that any further rescue attempts could be made but by then very few people had any hope of finding anyone alive. Over the course of the next 44 days bodies were recovered and identified. Most were too scorched or putrid to be identified by physical features so friends and family had to identify them by belongings found on their person.

Page showing a table with the Name, day of birth, how old and employment
Page Page showing the list of person killed by the Felliery Colliery explosion from, The funeral sermon of the Felling Colliery sufferers : to which are prefixed, a description and plan of that colliery : an account of the late accident there : of the fund raised for the widows and suggestions for founding a collier’s hospital, by Hodgson, John.
Newcastle [England] : Walker, 1813. (Clarke (Edwing) Local, Clarke 1833)

At 9:00 A.M. on 19 September the last body was recovered and by 11:00 AM the colliery was back to work as normal. The body of the 92nd victim has never been found.

All but four of these victims were buried together in the Heworth Chapel Yard in a single trench with brick partitions between every four coffins. In response to this tragedy several benevolent and prominent Newcastle citizens began taking up subscriptions for the families of the deceased. Additionally, this mining accident prompted safety improvements throughout the coal community. In correspondence to the inadequacy of lamps in a noxious environment new safety lamps were invented. The Society for the Prevention of Accidents in Coal Mines was also created shortly thereafter.

Plan of the workings of Felling Colliery
Plan of the workings of Felling Colliery from History of Felling on Tyne a file of ephemera (Clarke General Collection)

The Mystery of Margetts – April 2012

Broadside titled 'The Mysterious Disappearance and supposed death of Margetts.'
Crime Ephemera titled ‘The Mysterious Disappearance and supposed death of Margetts.’ Printed by R. Henderson, Churchway, North Shields, 1838 (Ephemera Collection)

As a means of spreading information quickly and cheaply among working class and increasingly literate populations, printed ephemera was both a forerunner and supplement to early newspapers. The activity of using local printers to convey a message, including advertising goods and services, local events, and public notices peaked in the 19th Century. These were never meant to become historical artefacts, rather to be passed around, stuffed in pockets, pasted to walls and read out loud to communicate an idea at the time then be thrown away or often reused to wrap meat, cakes and soap. Because of this, where they have survived surreptitiously, such material gives us a useful insight into societies at the time and are a useful research resource.

A prevalent use for this type of ephemera was as crime notices; alerting people to misdemeanours and often offering rewards for information. The broadsides featured here, which were essentially posters that would have been displayed in prominent public places, concern the mysterious disappearance of a local surgeon’s apprentice John Margetts.

The broadside titled ‘The Mysterious Disappearance and supposed death of Margetts’ (above) implicates a Mr Gaunt in “gulling the public” over his disappearance. It also suggests that infamous murderers William Burke and William Hare, who from 1827 to 1828 killed 17 people in Edinburgh and sold the corpses to a private anatomy lecturer for dissection, were questioned in connection with his disappearance but denied all knowledge. The anonymous writer does not seem to fully believe this, asking “…who can put faith in such bloody-minded wretches…”.

In broadside titled ‘John Gaunt in the matter of Margetts’ (below), writer Robert Baird is much more resolute in his belief that John Gaunt is behind Margetts’ disappearance and deeply sceptical of a separate broadside “posted up in South Shields” by Gaunt, seeking to exonerate himself.

He alleges Gaunt’s claim that Margetts left to enter the service of the East India Company, based on an entry in their books, is false as it is not the same John Margetts, or may even be a forgery by Gaunt himself.

Particularly damning is the claim that Gaunt offered Baird “£100, a new Suit of Clothes, and his Daughter” to keep quiet!

Broadside titled 'John Gaunt in the matter of Margetts'
Crime Ephemera titled ‘John Gaunt in the matter of Margetts’ printed by B. Henderson, North Shields, 1839 (Ephemera Collection)

Further research from contemporary copies of newspapers (available to Newcastle students through the 19th Century British Library Newspapers) sheds a little more light on the mystery.

Amid the claims and counter claims, we learn from these sources that two gentlemen from Newcastle petitioned the Scottish courts for the re-apprehension of William Hare, who turned King’s evidence against his accomplice to be spared execution, because they suspected Margetts of being the unidentified “Englishman murdered by Burke and Hare” (The Glasgow Herald, Feb. 16, 1829).

The reason behind Robert Baird’s suspicions also become clear as Margetts was last seen on the 22nd February 1827 after being sent with some medicine for John Gaunt’s wife. Seemingly dogged by rumours he was involved, John Gaunt successfully won 5 pounds and 20 shillings “compensation for certain slanderous words… reflecting on his character” (The Newcastle Courant, 1st March 1834), at the Newcastle Spring Assizes court after two individuals accused him in the pub, due to his extravagant lifestyle, of getting his living “by other means”; namely the ‘burking’ of Margetts. The term was derived from the aforementioned William Burke, and meant to smother and compress the chest of a victim in order to sell the corpse to medical schools. This was particularly profitable before the Anatomy Act of 1832, as doctors could then only lawfully use the corpses of executed criminals to teach their students. As the demand outstripped the supply, grave robbers or worse made a roaring trade!

Despite John Margetts Snr. placing reward notices for information in the Newcastle Courant on 3rd May 1828 and again as late as 7th December 1839, it seems the true fate of his son remains lost to history. Although it is little solace to poor Margetts, however, these examples of printed ephemera show how crime and punishment was viewed and enforced at street level through a shared morality and sense of justice… or just as a means of spreading malicious gossip!

Can you shed any more light on the Mystery of Margetts?

Mercator’s atlas – March 2012

Map of Northumberland
Map of Northumberland from Mercator, G. Historia mundi: or, Mercator’s atlas: containing his Cosmographical description of the fabricke and figure of the world: lately rectified in divers places, as also beautified and enlarged with new mappes and tables by the studious industry of Ivdocvs Hondy; Englished by W. S.
(London: Printed by T. Cotes for Michael Sparke and Samuel Cartwright, 1635)
(Post-Incunabula Collection: PI 912 MER Quarto)

Gerardus Mercator was born 500 years ago, on 5th March 1512. He was a Flemish cartographer who made it possible to navigate straight paths across the entire ocean.

Although he came to be known for cartography, Mercator’s main income source was initially in the crafting of mathematical instruments and he would later teach mathematics at the academic college in Duisburg.

While working in Leuven, he struck out as an independent mapmaker, producing maps of Palestine (1537), the world (1538) and Flanders (1540). In 1552 he relocated to Duisburg where he opened a cartography workshop and found employment as the city’s surveyor.

Mercator put his atlas together in the early 1570s when the son of his patron, the crown prince of Cleves, was planning a grand tour of Europe. It was based on his cylindrical projection (a major revolution) and compiled from a collection of wall maps that were available in his workshop, as well as some of his own hand-drawn maps. He copied the maps, then cut and pasted them into the bound format that would come to be known as an atlas.

Page from  Mercator, G. Historia mundi
Page from Mercator, G. Historia mundi: or, Mercator’s atlas: containing his Cosmographical description of the fabricke and figure of the world: lately rectified in divers places, as also beautified and enlarged with new mappes and tables by the studious industry of Ivdocvs Hondy; Englished by W. S.
(London: Printed by T. Cotes for Michael Sparke and Samuel Cartwright, 1635)
(Post-Incunabula Collection, PI 912 MER Quarto)

The Philip Robinson Library copy is an ‘Englished’ version of the edition published by Jodocus Hondius (1563-1612). Mercator’s work had become eclipsed by Ortelius’ Theatrum Orbis Terrarum but Hondius purchased the plates for Mercator’s Atlas in 1604 and, in reprinting it with additional maps, re-established Mercator’s reputation. The Mercator/Hondius series would go on to include a second and a pocket edition. This copy also has an illustrated title page from the second edition, printed in London for Micheall [sic] Sparke in 1637 pasted in at the front.

Charles Dickens (1812-1870) – February 2012

Front cover of Little Dorritt, no III
Front cover of Little Dorit, no.III (Rare Books, RB823.83 DIC)

7th February 2012 marks the 200th anniversary of the birth of Charles Dickens, regarded by many as the consummate Victorian author.

He began his career in journalism, writing for the journals The Mirror of ParliamentThe True Sun and later, The Morning Chronicle. The contacts he made in the press industry enabled him to publish Sketches by Boz (1836): a collection of short portrayals of London characters and scenes which were illustrated by George Cruikshank and had previously been serialised in popular newspapers and periodicals.

John Macrone first published Sketches as a two-volume set in February 1836 and followed it with a second complete series in one volume in August that same year. It is a work of both non-fiction and fiction.

Title page of Sketches of Boz, 1836
Title page from Sketches by Boz (1936) (19th Century Collections,  19th C. Coll. 823.83 DIC)

Dickens’ family had been sent to Marshalsea prison when his father fell into debt. Dickens had been sent to work in a blacking factory.

The social ills of the Nineteenth Century such as child labour, the Poor Law and the poor treatment of London’s waif-children are recurrent themes in his novels.

In The Adventures of Oliver Twist, 1837-39 (19th Century Collection, 19th C. Coll. 823.83 DIC) workhouse conditions, the recruitment of children as criminals, the social effects of industrialisation, London slums and the hypocrisies of the middle-class come under particular scrutiny.

Illustration of 'The Last Chance'
Illustration of ‘The Last Chance’ from The Adventures of Oliver Twist (19th Century Collection, 19th C. Coll. 823.83 DIC)

Dickens first visited America in 1842, his impressions of which are described in American Notes. He was already popular in the U.S. and was mobbed on arrival. Here his interest in social reform continued and his itinerary included visits to prisons, factories and hospitals. He was also saw first-hand the effects of slavery and was a vehement campaigner for its abolition. The trip was both a success and a disappointment: he wearied of the attention he attracted, failed to persuade Americanc of the need for an international copyright agreement, and was unimpressed by the level of information put out by the press. The success of the British reading tour and the prospect of large profits motivated him to visit America again in 1867 but by this time his health was failing and he did not travel far.

Illustration of emigrants: a crowd of people on board a ship.
Image of ‘Emigrant’ from the Illustration London News (19th Century Collection, 19th C. Coll. 030 ILL)

Many nineteenth-century authors established themselves through writing serialised fiction. That is, the issuing of instalments in newspapers, like the Illustrated London News, and popular magazines, like The Strand, or, as ‘part serials’ i.e. discrete monthly parts. Serialisation impacted upon the novel form: the more an author wrote the more handsomely they were paid but there was also a need to engage readers with every instalment and authors like Dickens adapted plots according to reader responses. Serialisation made book-buying affordable for the middle-class because it spread the cost of purchasing a novel over an average of eighteen to twenty months, with each instalment selling at an average of 1 shilling – a little over £2.00 in today’s spending worth. Typically, when the final instalment had been acquired, the parts were stripped of their paper wrappers and advertisements, trimmed and bound in leather or fine cloth. Thus it is rare to find novels as part serials today. The copy of Little Dorrit (see image at the beginning of this post), 1855-57 (Rare Books, RB823.83 DIC) which is held in the Rare Books collection is a good example of a book in parts. The parts are stab stitched, with paper wrappers intact, marked with the price and some of the parts bear the inscription of a former owner and the stamp of Holden bookseller, Church St., Liverpool. It offers an opportunity to experience the text as the contemporary readers would have experienced it, with a greater number of illustrations (by H.K. Browne) and the cliffhangers at the end of each part.

Dickens’ final novel, The Mystery of Edwin Drood, 1870 (Rare Books, RB823.83 DIC) remains unfinished. There are no clues regarding an intended ending in the notes which Dickens left although he sent a summary of the story to his friend John Forster. He died from a stroke, having completed a full day’s work on the novel. The sixth instalment was the last to be published.

Extract from The Mystery of Edwin Drood
Extract from The Mystery of Edwin Drood, 1870 (Rare Books, RB823.83 DIC)