Author Archives: Rachael

It’s good to talk

Posted on by
Reply

Woman whispers to the girlfriend secrets

Dr Stefanie Reissner, a lecturer in organisational studies from Newcastle University Business School, has revealed that what is widely considered gossip in the workplace can actually help boost work performance.

My research, funded by the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC), found that a company is a community that is maintained by sharing personal stories, which I call peer storytelling. Organisations that use peer storytelling well, establish constructive working relationships that are vital for effective operations, leading to improved business outcomes.

From childhood, individuals are conditioned to respond to and understand problems and issues, through storytelling. This translates into the world of work.

The research shows that sharing personal stories, from the funny to the emotional, can allow individuals to connect with others at work. Such a ‘connection’ enables them to understand colleagues and their actions in the workplace. This leads to improved judgement about behaviour, with benefits such as employees feeling more comfortable challenging one another. The result is more robust decision making and, arguably, better work performance.

Informal work conversations often get a bad press because they allegedly distract from the task at hand. But I ask: does being professional mean to be authoritative and impersonal on all occasions? My study shows that peer storytelling can alleviate pressure at work. If people are more at ease at work, they can be more focussed and productive in their daily routines.

I would encourage firms to appreciate the importance of peer storytelling as employees can convey everything from what makes them ‘tick’ to their ethics at work. In fact, far from distracting, peer storytelling can be good for an organisation.

This is pertinent nowadays when we are seeing rises in new business models like ‘hot-desking’ and limited personal interaction with colleagues and managers. Appreciating the human side of an organisation is vital in building a cohesive workforce in today’s network economy.

But, despite the potential benefits of peer storytelling, there can be negative effects on individuals and the organization. For example, the communication grapevine – an informal network by which unofficial information is transmitted within a place of work – can be harmful when rumour or inaccurate detail leads to misunderstanding and destroys relationships, trust and reputation.

I hope that the findings from this research can challenge the way employers think about how they build staff relationships and HR policies to foster meaningful interaction in the workplace.

The findings come from data collected from interviews with 75 individuals, between 2010 and 2012, and are now available in print. The book Storytelling in Management Practice, authored by Stefanie Reissner and Victoria Pagan, explores how managers use storytelling in practice, as well as its functions at different levels within an organisation.

Shifting perspectives on management

Posted on by
Reply

Professor John Wilson, the Director of Newcastle University Business School (UK), introduces a blog which will offer new perspectives on topical issues in management, economics, and innovation.

What does the term management mean to you?

We live in a world of uncertainty and with this we have witnessed some huge failures of management, namely, failure of those in charge to make sense of a business issue and make the right decision.

Management is a term that has become imbued with tales of disaster, from Enron and the current financial recession to the BP Gulf oil spill of 2010.

In many scenarios top management have set targets – often financial – related to sales and returns to shareholders; meaning that the focus of the organisation has become the achievement of these targets at the expense of customer service and, in extreme cases, legality.

Here, at Newcastle University Business School, we want to make management a career of choice for people who want to make a difference. Our mission is to build excellence in our teaching while providing new, global business perspectives that contribute to the responsible and ethical shaping of society.

So how do we start to solve this issue and make sure our future leaders can manage safely, efficiently and sustainably; not focused on the bottom line, but on the holistic picture? How can we start to shift this current perspective on management?

Quite simply, we must go back to the basics: the education of management practice and how we teach this craft.

At school and university there is a risk that management (business studies) is seen as either a second-rate subject or studied primarily as a route to employment, rather than having a passion for the subject.

Here, at Newcastle University Business School, we want to inject it with a new perspective: to give it a true meaning that has been lost and overwritten during recent crises.

The true meaning of management is centered upon some key principles:

• responsibility – changing the world for the better through ethical supervision;
• bravery – employees standing up to forces driving them to do the wrong thing;
• innovation – constantly seeking and adopting improvements to products, services and ways of working;
• collaboration – enabling individuals from different backgrounds, disciplines and cultures to work together effectively to create value and to develop their effectiveness; and
• being ambidextrous – exploring and innovating to create the ‘business for tomorrow’ and at the same time making sure that the ‘business of today’ operates effectively and continues to develop.

Good management practice is vital for new enterprises, growing successful organisations, tackling complex issues including societal challenges, research commercialisation and the successful development and operation of the public sector and not-for-profit and social enterprises.

The Business School draws on its research strengths, learning community and business engagement to engage students in active, learning activities that help develop higher level managerial competences.

We are working hard to ensure that management graduates are ready to share their knowledge with colleagues, teams and organisations, in a bid to develop their ability to make a difference, and start to develop a new perspective on management.

Professor John Wilson, Director of Newcastle University Business School.

Prince Charles calls for pensions industry ‘fit for 21st century’

Posted on by
Reply

By Anna Tilba, Newcastle University Business School

Speaking to a conference of National Association of Pension Funds, Prince Charles voiced his concerns over whether Britain’s’ pension system is built to cope with its ageing population. He emphasised that it is pension funds’ duty to manage environmental, social and economic risks and to change the culture of ‘quarterly capitalism,’ which is unfit for purpose. Prince Charles left it up to pension funds to ‘help shape a system designed for the 21st century and not 19th century’.

Having spent over seven years researching pension fund governance and investment, I would say that yes, change is needed but it is unrealistic that this change will happen, due to issues around pension fund liabilities, complexity of pension fund investment, demographic changes and the current economic climate.
‘Quarterly capitalism’ whereby businesses pursue short term aims for short term gains at the end of each financial quarter, is the sign of our challenging economic times.

Firstly, there are issues around how trustees interpret their duty. The UK legal trust tradition, which gives pension fund trustees the power and the fiduciary duty to act in the best interests of pension fund members, means that trustees -on the most part- interpret that duty as acting in the best financial interests. My recent research into UK pension fund investment practices suggests that trustees’ interpretation of their fiduciary duty of care is a core guiding principal, which informs pension fund investment strategies and actually discourages share-owner and stewardship activities.

Increasing complexity with pension fund investment chain means that in practice, pension funds are far removed from the corporations in which they hold shares. Many delegate all to do with pension fund investments to financial intermediaries who themselves are focused on share trading, rather than responsible shared ownership. The complexity of pension fund investment and an increasing regulatory burden also means that trustees are too busy dealing with pension fund governance and compliance, rather than with monitoring investee corporations and accounting for environmental, social and governance risks.

Furthermore, pension funds are currently operating in an environment characterised by economic recession and unstable, and complex, financial markets. Sadly, pension fund finances are now suffering a double financial blow: one from falls in stock markets and another dealt by the economic recession, impacting on cash flows and pension contributions of the sponsoring companies and local authority councils.

According to the latest figures, pension fund funding deteriorated significantly between March 2011 and March 2012 – the funding ratio (assets divided by liabilities) also fell from 100 per cent to 83 per cent (The Purple Book, 2012), putting more pressure on schemes to look for short-term investment returns to improve funding.

Pension funds are also operating in a world of increased human longevity and progressing pension fund maturity. Scientific data shows that life expectancy rose both in men and women: a 65-year-old man retiring today will, on average, live to 89. As a result of increased life expectancy, pension fund liabilities have soared to £1.702.6 billion with pensions deficits rising to £677.3 billion in 2012, from £470.7 billion a year earlier (The Purple Book, 2012).

Pension fund deficits have created a need for pension funds to match assets with liabilities, the so-called Liability Driven Investment (LDI) is putting more pressure on pension funds to rely on the market, volatile as it may be, to address the funding problem. Pension funds are forced to seek more short-term investment solutions, capable of ensuring the continuous flow of investment income into the fund and secure the payment of pensions.

If we are to start tackling this pension issue, we need to account firstly for the complexity associated with current financial markets. Secondly, we need to focus more attention to the responsibilities and accountability of financial intermediaries such as investment consultants advising the trustees and the investment fund managers who manage pension fund assets on their behalf.

With these two actions, we could make some steps towards the much needed change Prince Charles has called for.

Think family

Posted on by
Reply

It would seem that even the big television networks are creating programmes around the concept of ‘the family’.   From The Simpsons, Shameless, Rome, to the Tudors some very popular series have been made.  But why are they getting such great ratings?

Perhaps it’s because everyone can relate to the idea of a family.  But are families the bedrock of society that politicians believe?

One of my research themes that I work on with colleagues – James Cornford and Susan Baines – revolves around the family, and in particular how the government uses information system to ‘think’ family.

As we all know from our own personal lives: the idea of a ‘family’ – never mind the reality – can be very complicated.

Historically, under previous administration public bodies were asked to ‘Think Family’.

This has led to a number of government programmes that have encouraged services to integrate their facilities around families in order to co-ordinate support and intervention. This has led to a range of interests attempting to make sense of what to do about families.

Our research has shown that only when the government starts to grapple with the complexities of the ‘family’ will we really make progress with all sorts of families, including those who need the most support from our society. 

However, this is not a jigsaw where the problem has a boundary and is solved by integrating pieces together.

Different bits of the state see different versions of the family – and different things entirely for one department a jigsaw for another a crossword puzzle.

For instance: schools think family in terms of parenting; social services in terms of potential risk; child support agency in terms of fatherhood; and parts of the NHS in terms of genetics, the police in terms of crime and so on.

Rather like our own families it is the stories (often supported by artefacts such as family albums) and the changes that happen that potentially brings these strands together.

So when we come back to examining what the government is doing with its troubled family agenda, we might ask the questions: what interventions are being delivered, using which version of the family, to which of the family members benefit, and with what accounts?

It is clear that rather than families being the static structures we think about in terms the way a family trees represents them, they are lived projects (rather similar to real trees and their ecologies) which evolve over time. 

So in terms of family policy and practice those thinking about families need to have a more elastic idea of what families are to help those working with them and the families themselves to cultivate the best conversations they can have.

If you have a chance, you can read our recent research paper on the topic by clicking here

Dr Rob Wilson
Director of the KITE Research Centre and Senior Lecturer, Newcastle University Business School

If you cannot build a business around it, it doesn’t matter

Posted on by
Reply

A recent event held at Newcastle University Business School saw guest speaker, Todd Brinton, discuss needs-based innovation in the medical field.

Medical devices innovation that is patient-needs driven rather than being the result of a technology push, can be built into a sustainable business that benefits patients and makes money for the innovator.

How does one find real medical problems that need to be solved? Why do we call them needs?

Todd Brinton, MD, fellowship director of Stanford University’s Biodesign Program, cardiologist and bioengineer, presented a bootcamp and a master class in innovation to a mixed university and industry audience.

At Stanford University the Biodesign program teaches the needs-based innovation methodology to their fellows in a year-long program with the purpose of creating entrepreneurs – people with the skills needed to take inventions to market. In the 13 years of Biodesign, 29 companies have come out of the program, and over 100 fellows have graduated.

Teams aim to find a strategic focus, look for problems, and then turn those problems into more generalised needs.

Teams are key – they must include a partnership between people with clinical, scientific, engineering and business development skills; these teams are found to innovate the best.

The team must take a strategic focus on an area that it cares about, and then immerse themselves in the clinical field of interest.  Once they are there they need to observe; get dirty; get in to see actual clinical practise and take notice of frustrated people; use fresh eyes and ask naïve questions because there are many, many problems.

Each observed problem represents a need. Some of these needs affect many patients and, when this need, this opportunity, is thoroughly evidenced, the opportunity is ripe for innovation, invention and business development.

Written by Lucille Valentine

The best of both worlds

Posted on by
Reply

One of the first lessons I learnt when I qualified as an accountant was how different studying the theory of auditing was, to walking into a client’s office and trying to work the auditing software.
It is such moments in your early career that you realise the shift between ‘learning’ and ‘doing’.

Tomorrow, the Business School, PwC (PwC) and awarding body ICAEW, will celebrate its ten year anniversary of the ‘Flying Start programme’, a business, accounting and finance degree: a course that has had a decade of experience in merging ‘the learning’ with ‘the doing’.

The course is a long-standing example of how fusing theory and practice benefit the student proficiency of a subject. There is no denying that good work experience only benefits future career prospects.

The importance of this to the Business School is paramount, but it also raises interesting questions about what employers expect of graduates in today’s competitive job market, and what we can do to meet these needs.

Delivered by a team of academics and PwC, the Flying Start programme is a four year degree that enables students to put classroom theory into commercial practice on placement, and relates practical experience back to studies.

The degree affords students with an insight to the world of work, providing them with a great opportunity to harness the practical skills needed, with their own knowledge-base gained from within a lecture theatre.

In my position as a degree programme director, I have spoken to many employers about what they want to see in a graduate: one who can ‘hit the ground running’, a good level of industry, with team work and communication skills.

Higher Education Institutions (HEIs) are charged with the brief to create students who are prepared for the demands of the workplace – something that the Business School has been dedicated to achieving, and meeting such needs through programmes like Flying Start.

HEIs are moving away from the ‘chalk and talk’ educational experience to far more innovative and practical ways to impart knowledge: it’s an exciting time for the Business School and we are looking forward to the next 10 years.

Dr Simon Parry, Degree Programme Director BA (Hons) Business, Accounting and Finance

Newcastle University Business School retains its EQUIS accreditation

Posted on by
Reply

Newcastle University Business School is delighted to announce that it has been re-accredited by EQUIS for a further three years. EQUIS accreditation from the European Foundation for Management Education (EFMD) is held by an elite group of only 142 schools worldwide and is held to be one of the best and most complete ways to certify the quality of a business school. The Business School was first accredited in 2010.

Business schools that are accredited by EQUIS must demonstrate not only high general quality in all dimensions of their activities, but also a high degree of internationalisation. EQUIS schools reflect academic quality combined with professional relevance; a strong interface with business; and an effective learning environment that favours the development of students’ managerial and entrepreneurial skills combined with a global perspective.

EQUIS re-accreditation involves an extensive self-assessment by the School, the visit of an international review team who spend several days interviewing many stakeholders of the School, and finally an evaluation by a highly experienced panel of the assessment and findings of the review team, to determine whether the School should be granted accreditation. More information on EQUIS is available at www.efmd.org/equis.

Professor John Wilson, Director of Newcastle University Business School, said “One of my first challenges as the new Director of the School was to host the EQUIS re-accreditation visit last December and I am delighted that we have been successful. The achievement of re-accreditation is testimony to the quality of our staff, students, alumni and partners and provides an ideal foundation for the further development of the School”.

 

The wonder of Professor Brian Cox and female role models

Posted on by
Reply

Comment by Professor Pooran Wynarczyk:

 I am sure there are few people who don’t know who Professor Brian Cox is but how many have heard of Dr Maggie Aderin-Pocock?

Since 2011 there has been a surge in the take up of science and maths A- Levels, and this has been attributed to the popularity of the physics professor and TV presenter, Brian Cox, a prime example of the effect exposure to positive role models can have. 

And as International Women’s Day approaches I have one message: we must stop focussing on the under representation of women in business, and celebrate the great role models we have to get more women into science, technology, engineering and math (STEM) subjects.

When people asked to name a female scientist, most come up with ‘Marie Curie’. This is not to  deny the fact  that she was truly a  remarkable  woman  but there are many other  women around the world whose  accomplishments  should be made more visible.

I have picked five inspirational women to highlight the great work and impact women are making to our scientific world:

1. Pamela Ann Melroy (Former NASA Astronaut)
2. Maggie Aderin-Pocock (TV Presenter, Do We Need the Moon?)
3. Dr Helen Czerski  (Physicist,    TV Presenter, Orbit: Earth’s Extraordinary Journey)
4. Professor Alice Roberts (Anatomist, Author and  TV Presenter,  Incredible Human Journey) 
5. Dr Aarathi Prasad (Former research scientist in cancer genetics who now works in science policy and journalism)

A key area of my research interest – or rather a ‘wonder’ – is the reasons behind the gender divide in the take up of STEM subjects.  And from my and many others’ research one key reason is clear: a severe lack of visible female role models. 

An issue at the heart of the debate over the gender divide in STEM subjects is the portrayal of female role models: they are largely invisible, and have been for a long time. 

We need to open our eyes and see the adverse effect negative labelling of women in scientific and technological fields, and in turn the lack of female role models, is having on the current labour market. A lack of exposure, as well as a lack of genuine representation, risks a very dangerous self-fulfilling prophecy. That is to say, if we focus too much on under-representation, we miss the opportunity to inspire the next generation through shining examples of women in science and technology.

Existing research claims that exposure to positive  role models during the critical junctures, i.e. earlier years of education, has a positive influence on self efficacy and, hence, inspiring future career choices. 
Female role models are incredibly important as they allow individuals to showcase their achievements and could encourage more girls to get involved in business – especially in areas such as science and technology which have traditionally been associated with men.
 
More often than not, the news that is hitting the headlines focuses on gender imbalance, stereotype beliefs and the under-representation of women in business. This in itself can mask advancements that are being made, which in turn discourages women from reaching high positions beyond the glass ceiling.  

If existing women scientists continue to remain largely ‘invisible’ and not seen to be enjoying a rewarding and progressive career, combined with being unrecognised for their contribution to scientific and technological advancement, they are unlikely to be able to act as role models and serve the purpose of further recruitment and retention.

Some may argue that by highlighting the under-representation and barriers to participation for women entering STEM subjects and careers, aids awareness and policy making. 

I would say that this provides little support to those employed, or planning to enter STEM   professions. On the contrary, it can have an adverse effect, and may actually discourage girls and women from pursuing education and careers in these fields.

My research has revealed the ambitious, invisible, female role models that can be engaged to promote a greater uptake of women in science, technology, engineering and mathematics.

And with International Woman’s Day in mind, I want to call out for more inspirational woman to seize the spot light like Brian Cox. 

Who would make your top five?

 

Newcastle University Business School announces David Goldman professors of innovation and enterprise

Posted on by
Reply

A duo of enterprising talent has been appointed as the Business School confirms its chairs in innovation and enterprise

An innovation guru with unrivalled experience in building the world’s biggest brands, Professor Roy Sandbach is set to be the 10th David Goldman Visiting Professor of Innovation and Enterprise: continuing the tradition of the David Goldman endowment’s highly regarded contribution to enterprise and innovation in the region.

The David Goldman endowment was established at the Business School in 2001 to create a legacy in memory of David Goldman, founder of software company Sage Group Plc. Professor Roy Sandbach is to be welcomed to the Business School as the 2013-14 Goldman Visiting Professor, at his inaugural lecture on 13 March.

It is almost certain that you will use everyday products at home that were conceived and developed by Professor Roy Sandbach. For over 30 years he has led global innovation programmes at Procter and Gamble (P&G), the $80BN multinational and the biggest consumer products company in the world.

Beyond the realms of P&G, Roy brings his skills to bear across the business, science, design and education sectors throughout the UK.

Currently, he leads business engagement for the Centre for Competitive Design at Cranfield University. Roy’s lifelong commitment to science remains strong, he is: a Trustee at Newcastle’s Centre for Life; sits on the Industry Council of the Royal Society of Chemistry; and is a business ambassador for NetPark, the hi-tech science park in County Durham. He is also a non-executive director of NCFE, the national qualifications body, and a governor at Seaton Burn College.

In March he will take the David Goldman Visiting Professor reins from James Timpson OBE, chief executive of the family firm Timpson Group.

Professor Roy Sandbach said:

“I am honoured to accept the David Goldman Visiting Professorship. It offers a wonderful opportunity for me to share broadly my knowledge of strategic business innovation to support enterprise for wealth-creation and social benefit. It is a particular pleasure for me to be able to do this in my home region, among friends and at the university where I gained my Ph.D. Most of all, it will be an honour to build on the legacy of David Goldman.”

The Goldman Endowment funds: a permanent Professorship role within the Business School; the David Goldman Visiting Professor of Innovation and Enterprise; a David Goldman Doctoral Studentship, and the Annual David Goldman Lecture.

The Business School has also announced that its new, permanent David Goldman Professor of Innovation and Enterprise is Savvas Papagiannidis.

As an alumnus of the University, with over 16 consecutive years of studying at the University, Savvas has achieved two PhDs, two Masters, and founded three e-businesses.

Professor Papagiannidis’ research interests lie in the e-business discipline, where he aims to investigate how e-business technologies affect social and business environments, organisational strategies and underpinning business models, and how these are implemented in terms of functional innovations.

Professor Papagiannidis said:

“I am delighted with my new role as the permanent David Goldman Professor of Innovation and Enterprise. 

“I hope that in my new position I am able to make an impact by leading the development and delivery of the innovation and enterprise agenda of the Business School, by encouraging sustainable relationships with internal and external stakeholders.

“I am looking forward to welcoming Professor Roy Sandbach to the Business School.  As an expert in open innovation, brand building, and networking for competitive advantage, Roy’s high- calibre career is one that makes him very suited to the demands of this visiting professorship.”

David Goldman Visiting Professor 2012-13, James Timpson OBE said:

“This role is all about imparting knowledge and more importantly, inspiring enterprise.  However, it isn’t a one-way process: I have also been educated by the students and businesses I have met over the past 12 months.  It has been a great experience, and I am delighted to have been given such an esteemed role. 

“I wish Roy a very enjoyable and educational year!”

If you would like to book your free ticket to the Goldman Lecture please email: bsevents@ncl.ac.uk

 Past David Goldman Visiting Professors of Innovation and Enterprise:
2012- 2013 – James Timpson, OBE, chief executive of Timpson Group
2011-2012 – Tom Maxfield, entrepreneur and former Sales Director for Sage Group
2010-2011 – Will Dracup, founder and chairman of Nonlinear Dynamics
2008 -2010 – Dr Tony Trapp, chairman of IHC Engineering Business.
2007-2008 – Fiona Cruickshank, co-owner and director of SCM Pharma.
2006 -2007 – Paul Callaghan, chairman of Leighton Group.
2005 – 2006 – Chris Thompson, managing director of Express Group.
2004 – 2005 – Mark I’Anson, technology entrepreneur.
2003 – 2004 – Paul Collard, chief executive at Creativity, Culture and Education

Gateshead students take the chequered flag at F1 in Schools North East England Regional Finals 2013

Posted on by
Reply

Newcastle University Business School hosted this year’s regional finals, which saw a team of students from Emmanuel College, Gateshead, celebrate a win.  The winning team are through to the F1 in Schools™ UK National Finals after an intense and hard-fought North East England Regional Finals. This Formula One™ inspired educational challenge has captured the imagination of students up and down the country and with a place on the grid at the F1 in Schools World Finals 2013 to be held in Austin, Texas for the UK National Champions, every team put in hundreds of hours of work in their pursuit of the prize.
 
Red Kite Racing, a team from Emmanuel College with team members: Emily Miller, Team Manager, Elliott Johnson, Design Engineer; Jack Collier, Design Engineer and Rhys Rogers, Manufacturing Engineer, proved that hard work pays off as they collected the 1st Place F1Class trophy, as well as the Best Engineered Car Award and Fastest F1 Car Award, with the team’s car racing down the track in a time of 1.166 seconds.
 
Elliott Johnson said of the team’s success, “I think we took the top award because there was a lot of teamwork, working to our strengths, many hours of hard work put into our design, our presentation and sponsorship. Now we’re looking to the National Finals and hoping to improve our design for it. It’s a once in a lifetime opportunity to be going there, so we’re really looking forward to it.”
 
Red Kite Racing were one of three teams who raced to victory at the Regional Final and will be representing their school at the F1 in Schools UK National Finals which takes place at the Big Bang Fair, ExCel, London on 15 and 16 March.
 
F1 in Schools challenges students to create their own Formula One team which is commissioned to design, construct and race the fastest miniature Formula One Car of the Future; a 21cm long scale model built from a block of balsa wood and powered by a compressed air cylinder. Each team of between three and six students creates a ‘pit’ display at the Regional Final and showcases their work in developing their race car, with a verbal and written presentation for the judges. The teams then race their model cars on a specially designed 20 metre test track, with the cars covering the distance in just over one second.
 
The competition links closely to the research of Professor Pooran Wynarczyk, of Newcastle University Business School, who studies gender within innovation, and the uptake of STEM subjects. 
 
Professor Pooran Wynarczyk, director of the Small Enterprise Research Unit at Newcastle University Business School, commented:
 
“Working with the F1 in Schools UK team to host the regional finals at the Business School is a highly valuable exercise, as it brings together research and practical learning to enhance a young person’s education.
 
“My research is all about encouraging, and increasing the uptake of, young people into the areas of Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics (STEM), and allowing them to realise the potential careers, and paths to such careers, that sit within these subject areas.
 
“It’s always an enjoyable and exciting atmosphere at the event for everyone, and we hope the activities of the day translate into a buzz of new ideas and enthusiasm, from the pupils, towards STEM subjects and activities.”

In addition to representing their country at the World Finals, the F1 in Schools UK Champions and runners up will receive tickets to the 2013 FORMULA 1 BRITISH GRAND PRIX at Silverstone. The National Champions will also win a Red Bull Racing F1 team factory tour and a TW STEEL Watch for each team member.
 
Andrew Denford, Founder and Chairman, F1 in Schools, said of this week’s North East England Regional Finals, “We’re experiencing significant growth in the schools entering the challenge this season and the standards are extremely high. The students had to cope with the nerves of presenting to a panel of judges and the pressures of putting their models to the test against the best of the region and all the teams put up a great fight, with only a few points separating the top contenders for a place at the National Finals”.
 
Denford adds, “The challenge not only tests the students in many key areas of educational study such as the STEM subjects, but gives them an opportunity to gain experience of many life skills which will be invaluable in their future careers.”
 
The North East England regional finals took place with the assistance of a host of sponsors and supporters. Amongst these are the IET, Denford, and City University London all of whom are continuing their support of F1 in Schools for the coming year.

Photos from the day can be found by clicking here >