Following the success of our Open Access Support Sessions earlier in the year, our monthly informal sessions will be returning from September.
Are you looking for advice and information on open access or managing publications? Come to one of our monthly drop-in sessions and meet members of the Library Research Services team, who will be happy to answer questions on:
Publishing open access
Understanding research funder policy requirements
Copyright and licencing issues relating to your publications
Uploading your publications to MyImpact
Whether you’re a seasoned researcher, student or simply keen to explore the possibilities within open access, these sessions offer a welcoming space to ask questions, gain insights and delve deeper into the realm of open access.
Each session will focus on a specific area and how this relates to open access:
In April 2023, the Library was awarded a small grant after applying to the QR Enhancing Research Culture (ERC) Project fund. This project application aimed to address a gap in University support for open access publishing. The funds requested were used to pay article processing charges (APCs) for papers published in fully open access journals. Relevant articles were either the outcome of non-funded research activity (i.e. research that has not been funded through research council, industry or charity funding assigned to a specific project) or those that did not receive financial support for open access publishing from their associated funder (e.g. where there is no dedicated policy or funds for publishing open access). The aim was to remove a financial barrier to publishing research, giving authors more choice in where to publish their work while retaining their copyright.
Open publishing of research outputs increases visibility and accessibility of the research, which in turn can foster wider collaboration as more researchers are able to connect with each other’s work. Additionally, the wider public also gains access to the work, which is particularly significant for publicly funded activity. This forms part of the University’s approach to Open Research, encouraging researchers to incorporate open research practices into their work to make their processes and outputs more transparent and reproducible where possible. Open Research is a Top Priority Project in Newcastle’s Research Culture Programme and you can find out more about the broader open research activities by visiting the Library’s Open Research pages.
Currently, Newcastle University supports the publication of open access research by covering publishing costs through several publisher agreements and block grant funding received from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), Wellcome Trust, Cancer Research UK (CRUK) and the British Heart Foundation (BHF) (specifically for papers acknowledging these funders). Other funders, such as National Institute for Health Research (NIHR), allow open access costs to be charged direct to the grant or by applying to the funder for associated costs. The Newcastle University Research Publications and Copyright Policy also enables immediate, at no cost, open access of the author accepted manuscript (the version post peer-review but before final publication) for articles published in hybrid (subscription) journals, where readers pay a fee to view the non-open access published content. However, publishing for non-funded research in fully open access journals currently sits outside of these routes. Non-funded research makes up a relatively small portion of our publications, however, periodically the Open Access team within Library Research Services are approached by authors in need of such provision. After consultation with authors that the team have previously been unable to assist, we proposed the pilot scheme to trial a possible solution to this publishing barrier.
The Open Access Funding for Non-funded Research (Pilot) went live in April 2023 and was advertised University wide. Applications were received from across all faculties and reviewed by faculty representatives, with subsequent publication payments organised by the Library. Applications closed in June 2023, which was earlier than expected as ERC project funds were rapidly allocated. In the 3-month application period, the Library received 14 applications (Table 1), 10 of which were eligible for funding, with 9 being accepted. Applications not approved for this scheme were eligible for open access publication via publisher agreements, block grants or faculty funding. All 9 accepted articles were peer-reviewed, and published, in a range of journals from BMJ, Elsevier, JMIR, MDPI, Society of Neuroscience and Springer Nature (see the list at the end).
Applications
Total
By Faculty
Medical Science
Humanities and Social Sciences
Science, Agriculture & Engineering
Number of applications
14
7
3
4
Applications awarded open access funding
9
4
2
3
Table 1. Open Access funding application numbers by faculty
The pilot scheme was successful in demonstrating the need for financial support for some open access publications as these publications may not have been possible in the chosen journals without such provision. Feedback on the scheme (received July 2024) from the successful applicants to the fund was positive, see what they had to say below.
Open Access funding recipient 1:
“The OA process was extremely straight forward with timely communication and information to provide was not too onerous.
The funding allowed us to publish in a highly relevant Open journal in very good time from conducting the work. We have had much correspondence about our article since and shared this internationally. Our work is in medical education research and as such we don’t often have large pots of money that we can use to allow us to publish OA so this fund was crucial to us being able to do that.
I envisage a great need for this funding and if a similar fund was continued that would be highly important to driving our publication presence forward particularly in areas of education and also public/patient/community involvement in research where OA is essential.”
Open Access funding recipient 2:
“The funding and the way it was managed was very helpful and meant we were able to publish in a high profile journal […].
I know a few people in my networks have let me know they read it partly because it was in that particular journal and downloaded the open source data attached to it so far, and again because of the journal being known, it was identified and quoted in [an] online news site […].
Overall I’d say being able to publish it using the open access fund has increased its impact and been very positive! It would certainly be very useful for future publications too.”
Open Access funding recipient 3:
“Open Access funding enabled me to publish my study in a good quality journal. Since it is fully open access, I have got reasonable number of citations within the first year after publication. My study is being recognised by many researchers all around the world and they even contribute to their own research. I would not have done it without the support of this fund by the University. I appreciate this support and want this chance to continue in the future because it is really important for a researcher that their research reaches out to everyone without any restriction.”
In 2018 an Open Access publishing initiative ‘Plan S’ was launched, supported by an international consortium of research funding and performing organisations (cOAlition S). According to the Plan S principles of transformative arrangements (TAs) “all scholarly publications on the results from research funded by public or private grants provided by national, regional and international research councils and funding bodies, must be published in Open Access Journals, on Open Access Platforms, or made immediately available through Open Access Repositories without embargo”. With hybrid titles moving to fully open access, the removal of financial support for TAs from 2025 and uncertainties in funding in general, we predict that interest in a central fund to support the publication of non-funded research will continue.
One learning outcome from the scheme was the acknowledgement that the QR ERC Project fund is not appropriate for this type of support due to the nature of publications. The time lag between paper acceptance, publication and invoicing can vary massively (the average time from OA funding application to publication invoice for the pilot project was 107 days) and, in many cases, does not fit within the financial time restrictions of this annual funding. The Library continues to review how we can financially support our non-funded authors, in conjunction with all authors, to be able to publish in their journals of choice and share our research more widely.
Benthem de Grave et al. 2023 Smartphone apps for food purchase choices: scoping review of designs, opportunities, and challenges Journal of Medical Internet Research26 e45904 https://doi.org/10.2196/45904
Brown et al. 2023 Genetic analysis of blood molecular phenotypes reveals common properties in the regulatory networks affecting complex traits Nature Communications14 5062 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-40569-3
Cayci et al. 2023 Practices and perceptions of community pharmacists in the management of atopic dermatitis: systematic review and thematic synthesis MDPI Healthcare11 2159 https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11152159
Germann & Baker 2023 Testing a novel wearable device for motor recovery of the elbow extensor triceps brachii in chronic spinal cord injury eNeuro10 ENEURO.0077-23.2023 https://doi.org/10.1523/ENEURO.0077-23.2023
Law et al. 2024 The development and productivity of a measure for identifying low language abilities in children aged 24–36 months BMC Pediatrics23 495 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-023-04079-x
Tullo et al. 2023 Lost in translation: how can education about dementia be effectively integrated into medical school contexts? A realist synthesis BMJ Open13 e077028 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-077028
Yadav et al. 2023 Effective battery charging system using step voltage and step duty sizebased MPPT controller for solar PV system Energy Reports10 744 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2023.07.033
List of articles published as a result of the QR ERC Project fund
Since the launch of this addition of the open access policy, LRS have been on hand to answer queries about publishing monographs, edited collections and chapters open access, in particular relating to UKRI funded works, advising on publishing routes and how to comply with policy, where appropriate.
Throughout the first half of the 2024, we have visited three schools, hosted five drop-in support sessions, and presented an in-depth webinar to share the UKRI policy and the support we offer. We will continue to share details of our services in future workshops and presentations, and we are always available for 1-2-1 sessions for anyone who would like to know further details.
Following the policy update, we have received numerous queries about publishing books open access, from across all the faculties. They have covered a range of book types and publishers, including Bloomsbury, Boydell and Brewer, Bristol University Press, IWA Publishing, Manchester University Press, and Routledge. Where appropriate, we have advised on the different open access options available, such as publishing the final output open access or self-archiving the accepted manuscript.
Of the six applications received that acknowledge UKRI funding, are within the scope of the policy, and require funding to cover a book processing charge, all have been awarded funding from UKRI to cover the open access publishing costs. The funding is reserved until the books are published, at which time UKRI release the funds and complete the process.
We expect the first of the UKRI funded outputs to be published by September 2024, details of which will follow once available.
If you have any questions or concerns about the policy, and how this might affect any current or future publications, please contact openaccess@ncl.ac.uk.
The updated guidance around the UKRI open access policy for long-form publications is now available, and the Library Research Services team are here to provide support with the policy and publishing open access.
As detailed in our previous post, the UKRI policy update applies to monographs, book chapters and edited collections that acknowledge UKRI funding, and are published on or after 1 January 2024, where:
The final Version of Record or Author’s Accepted Manuscript must be free to view and download via an online publication platform, publisher’s website, or institutional or subject repository within a maximum of 12 months of publication.
Images, illustrations, tables and other supporting content should be included in the open access version, where possible.
The open access version of the publication must have a Creative Commons licence, with a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) licence preferred. An Open Government Licence is also permitted. (This requirement does not apply to third party materials included in the publication).
UKRI expects publications acknowledging their funding to be made open access, although they do allow some exemptions, which we are happy to discuss.
UKRI have a dedicated fund to support open access costs for long-form publications within scope of the policy, where publication via a green, free, route to open access is not an eligible option for authors. Applications for this fund are made via the library.
Our UKRI Policy for long-form publications page includes a summary of the policy, how grant holders can comply, details of exemptions and what funds are available to support open access publication. The page also has a link to the form we require to submit an application to UKRI on your behalf or if you want to discuss your options.
Library Research Services will be attending some faculty meetings, throughout March to May, to discuss what the policy means for authors, and how the library and UKRI will be supporting this. Alongside this, we will be holding a couple of webinars focused on the policy, along with general Open Access Support sessions for any open access queries. We are also available for 1-2-1 sessions as required.
If you have any questions or concerns about the policy, and how this might affect any current or future publications, please contact openaccess@ncl.ac.uk.
Are you looking for advice and information on open access or managing publications? Come to one of our monthly drop-in sessions and meet members of the Library Research Services team, who will be happy to answer questions on:
Publishing open access
Understanding research funder policy requirements
Copyright and licencing issues relating to your publications
Uploading your publications to MyImpact.
Whether you’re a seasoned researcher, student or simply keen to explore the possibilities within open access, this session offers a welcoming space to ask questions, gain insights and delve deeper into the realm of open access.
Each session will focus on a specific area of open access including an overview of library research services. These sessions are as follows:
Kelsey has drafted the first page of the comic below and would love some feedback. Specifically, what topics would you like to see covered and how is the readability? Any other feedback is welcome too, so please post your thoughts in the comments or contact Kelsey directly.
In collaboration with Northumbria University we are hosting an online demonstration and discussion of Octopus on November 28th, 1-2pm. Please find event details below and I hope you will be able to join us to learn more about how Octopus aims to support open research.
Octopus is a new publishing platform that is designed to be the primary research record, sitting alongside journal articles which have a more narrative style. Funded by UKRI and built in association with Jisc, it is the place where researchers can record their work in small units, and where the research’s quality can be assessed through peer review and ratings. It is designed to incentivize best practices in research and to make it easy for researchers to establish their priority and get their work ‘out there’ in a way that is fast, fair and free.
Presenter: Dr Alexandra Freeman, Creator of Octopus.
The inaugural Newcastle University Open Research Awards culminated in a celebration event where candidates shortlisted for an award we invited to present their case studies. We heard excellent presentations on the benefits and challenges of making research more open from postgraduates and researchers working in a range of disciplines and the winning case studies are presented below.
We’d like to thank all of the candidates who submitted a case study. The submissions we received were all of a high standard and we were delighted by the range of open research practices they described. We’d also like to thank the awards panel (Dr Stephen Parnell, Professor Neil Boonham, Dr Chris Emmerson and Jill Taylor-Roe) for their help with the very difficult job of choosing the winners.
These awards were made possible thanks to Newcastle University’s QR Enhancing Research Culture Project Fund 2022 in support of the University’s developing Research Culture Action Plan. A key strand of this plan seeks to make our research more transparent and reproducible and our data more accessible, to facilitate re-use and extend impact.
This case study described the design of open version control software to facilitate increased transparency in Cell Engineering. The panel felt this case study gave an excellent account of how this innovative open approach would increase public trust in research in a discipline where this is vital.
The panel felt this case study gave a frank and refreshing take on being open from the very start of a research project. It clearly outlined the benefits of openness through study pre-registration and replication. Although not part of the award criteria, it was heartening that a postgraduate student has adopted these principles so quickly in their research career.
This case study described the challenges and societal benefits of combining climate data from diverse sources and adapting them so that they were suitable for release as open datasets with associated open software. The panel also commended their commitment to training early career researchers in open practices.
Led by Renae J. Stefanetti (Exercise Physiologist), Alasdair Blain (Statistician), Linda Errington (Medical librarian), Laura Brown (Trial Manager), Jane Newman, Cecilia Jimenez Moreno (Physiotherapists), Robert McFarland (Paediatric Neurologist), Yi Shiau Ng, Doug Turnbull, and Gráinne S Gorman (Adult Neurologists).
This case study described a wide range of open research practices within their research, including open peer review, open access publication, the sharing of data and fully documented code and the creation of an interactive database of systematic review data. The challenges and benefits of these approaches were well articulated and it offered an excellent example of a group adopting the principles of open research.
Our winning case study described a consistently open approach across several research projects, using a wide range of open practices. They showed a clear understanding of the challenges, offered pragmatic solutions to overcome them and made a strong case for open research as a means to promote scientific progress. They also demonstrated a commitment to championing open research with both colleagues and students
Our thanks also go to Professor Candy Rowe, Dean of Research Culture and Strategy for helping us present these awards and for enabling them through funding from the University’s QR Enhancing Research Culture fund.
And the talks from all our shortlisted entrants were terrific and really inspiring-well done to everyone who entered and took part, and a big shout out to @sboneham and @ChrisJEmmerson who had the idea and brought it to fruition so brilliantly!
All colleagues are invited to attend the Open Research Awards celebration event on Tuesday 5th July from 12.00 to hear presentations from the shortlisted entries and to enjoy a networking lunch.
The Open Research Awards recognise staff and students who have used open practices to make research more accessible, transparent or reproducible, and demonstrate an understanding of the aims of Open Research.
If you would like to attend the celebration event please book below to allow us to cater for the appropriate number of people and for any special dietary requirements.
As part of Newcastle University’s Research Strategy, we are evolving our research culture in collaboration with the whole research community. We invite the research community across career stages, job families, and disciplines, to join this first Skills Academy Research Culture workshop: Towards Open Research.
The workshop will invite participants to consider open research practices and reflect on how they and the university can move towards a culture of more open research. In this workshop, we will consider open research principles and practices that increase transparency and rigour and accelerate the reach of our research.
Open research describes approaches to increase openness throughout the research cycle, including collaborative working, sharing and making research methodology, software, code, data, documentation and publications freely available online under terms that enable their reuse. Open research thereby increases the transparency, rigour and reproducibility of the research process and so can promote inclusivity, accelerate impact and improve public trust. However, understanding and adopting open research practices can be challenging. This workshop therefore will explore strategies for culture change here at Newcastle University.
Workshop Details
Date: Thursday 30th September, 10.00 – 12.00. Venue: Online. Facilitators: Chris Emmerson and Steve Boneham.
